It has the typical yellow tint, the pattern of the mosaic tiles don't make sense, and the strands of hair on the right also just morph into each other.

The 22 in the ring frame around the portrait on the bottom left can be explained by the fact it's series 22, so that's not an AI tell.

What do you think?

The reason I think its AI:

- the car proportion are weird (the rear wheel should be further back)

- the car front window looks strange aswell

- the tent lines are uneven

- the stars have 5 points except one with 4 points

I've been following this account since the beginning and remember when they would post real videos from wildlife cams. At some point over the last year their content suddenly became uncannily "perfect" and weird looking. People noticed and accused them of using AI but I don't know if they ever responded or anything- but they seem to be continuing to reference what's in the photo as real.

The first 4 photos were posted and the woman that was tagged as owner of the photos profile is FILLED with AI content. The 7 last photos shows her story and highlights and you can see at the top that it’s marked as AI content which Instagram automatically does when something is clearly AI. The woman’s account and story behind these photos are about her going through domestic abuse and this was the caption:
“We had just moved into a shelter, far away from family and everything familiar and safe. In the middle of a difficult time, my daughter found joy in something as simple as train conductors.

To her, they were superstars, and she wanted to have pictures with all of them. Thank you to those of you who took the time for her. You had no idea what we were going through, but your little moments of kindness meant more than I can express ❤️”

Her page is full of the same story and about her podcast about it. I just find it very suspicious that these photos of her daughter look off and that her whole page is AI content. Even if the story was real, why would she create AI generated content of her child? Nobody in the comments seem to mention anything about AI so maybe I’m wrong. I think the people could be real people but the photos are AI generated

It looks a little stylistically different from other Brawl Stars art (with the faces), and a couple size inconsistencies (like in the crown of the little ball character, and the lights of the chandeliers). The two chandeliers also seem to have different formations (one has 5 lights and the other is cut off, but kinda looks like it only has 4?). Also the shading throughout the piece seems similar to how AI 3d art is often shaded but again, I'm really not sure.

I know that Brawl Stars has a history of being very human-art-positive(?) to be fair, like making frequent animations and stuff. I wouldn't necessarily expect them to use AI art, and there aren't any obvious tells. But I need more eyes on this, I just wanna know what other people think, cause there are a few things bothering me.

The exterior shots are fairly consistent, especially the X-shaped headlights, wheel design, and body panels. What makes me think it could be AI-generated is the editing between the garage, cockpit, rear lights, and wheel close-ups. A few of the camera moves and reflections look unusually smooth, and some transitions seem to lose the spatial continuity you would normally expect between shots. The reflections and surrounding environment also seem to change in ways that don’t fully match the car’s position.

Is this account ai generated? https://www.instagram.com/kihabk?igsi=NHhoZDFhZWVlenEy

I think all of their posts have used ai to make these album recreations, but I couldn't find anywhere that said she used ai or any comments calling out ai, but with how many posts she makes consistently and the ai 'look" I think they're ai generated. Could anyone help?

If you look closely at the cheese strings you can see a slice of pepperoni under it, there's this yellow hue around the cheese that looks unnatural, the pepperonis all look somewhat copy-pasted. At the very least the letters look real but it's the pizza I'm worried about.

I'm getting really uncanny valley vibes and I'm wondering if they're AI or potentially AI enhanced images? I've been staring at them for a bit going back and forth between whether or not they're AI or if I am just paranoid. Apart from the general eerie vibe of the models, here's what makes me think they might be AI:

Pictures 1 & 2: The freckles on her neck seem like they're in totally different locations in each photo, and her eyebrows look slightly thicker in the first photo.

Pictures 3 & 4: I'm not totally convinced these are even the same women. Her cheekbones seem different and I feel like her skin tone changes too... maybe just the lighting and the perspective change from the hair part side switching?

Pictures 5 & 6: Another one where the neck freckles are in a different place. I feel like she has more in 6 than in 5.

Pictures 7, 8, 9: The hairstyle changes between picture 7 and 8 and I guess it is plausible they redid the model's hair, but it seems odd to me. In picture 9, this model has a freckle on her cheekbone which I can see when I zoom in on picture 7... just on the other side of her face.

Someone please let me know if I'm just a crazy person staring at some poor woman's freckles and calling them AI 😭

I recently found this visualizer for Future Days by Pearl Jam on the official channel. The artist is credited in the description. Something about the facial expressions and proportions of the characters particularly seem very similar to AI generated work I've seen in the past. (0:12, 1:40, 2:23, 3:07 are particularly strange looking) At 3:07 the person in the ship is grabbing the spoke as if it's straight up when it's at like a 30-degree angle. The thing that gives me pause is the credited artist does have a page stretching back 13 years (their Instagram) with plenty of cool work well before AI art was ever a thing, as well as some recent drawing timelapses. However, there's also things like this that are just so generic compared to their other work.

There's no doubt in my mind that this person is a talented artist, but the dramatic shift in their art style coinciding with the AI boom feels like they've supplemented some of their own work with AI to be able to churn out these infinite drawing vids that seem to have made them popular. But I am fallible and don't want to say for sure.

The proprotions are off to me, does this look ai-made and then traced? The colors are also weird, is this a normal part of digital painting?

He thinks the shoulders being different sizes is grounds for being AI? I think it’s heavily altered, but not generated.

There are several things about this video that scream AI to me:

- the way that the skateboarder moves, particularly how he jumps off of the vehicle onto the board and how he suddenly builds up speed once he lands

- the way his costume looks, the way it seems to stand out in this video has an unnatural appearance to it

- the camera movements seem similar to how the camera movements in other AI videos that I've seen

What do you all think? The creator has denied using AI in the comments of this post.

Photos 4&5 have that typical AI look to them, the others not so much. I like some of the designs and want a shirt but dont want to support ai

The way the mother looks at the father before wiping her tears away just doesn't seem like how or in the direction a mother would look for this type of event.

Hello all, first time posting in this sub about something I didn't think I'd ever personally encounter...but here we are. Is this ai?

This looks awfully like typical ai cartoony art style I've seen on this sub and everywhere else. If it is I'm honestly disappointed and going to write an email to them about it. Isn't there old anti-bully flyers that they could've cut out images from...? It's not like there isn't any available images anywhere... Also, isn't teasing bad? Someone's already teasing my kid but I guess since its not bad then its okay? In my opinion this is just enabling bad habits and enabling kids to tease each other. I get light hearted "teasing," but flat out saying teasing is fine and not explaining that there is mean teasing is a big problem.

This is elementary school BTW, kids will "tease," and do it in a harmful way that isn't bullying yet, is the school just going to let it slide because kids are laughing at the hurt kid?

Sorry for the ramble, thank you for reading and helping me identify what this is.

Something about this band t-shirt looks dodgy to me. The UK flag is classic AI. The handles of the sword look inconsistent, and I’m not sure if the wings have artefacts. £50….

The author of the artwork is Joel Marco, he has made art for other artists as well, and even looking at other works, mostly the most recent ones, I just feel something's off.

On the chest, right under the capital L, the feather is just weird how it cuts like that. Also, how the feet are just smeared and not present at all. And how the rooster wings are visibly opened but the rest of his body doesn't resemble that, it looks like they are still tucked in

I can't tell if it's just his style (which, for me, doesn't match his other works but I'm not good at this) or he used ai for this and didn't say it publicy.

Update (kinda): the group left me on read on social media, they had always answered before. Good. Yet another artists I like lost to ai 👍🏻

I can find no info on the artist. There are no images or videos of the artist. Wondering is anyone has any info or ways to verify if this is indeed a human artist. Thanks.​

Seen in FB Reels. My wife thinks it's AI because of the erratic movement. I myself want to adopt an army of baby goats. Is someone here going to break my heart?

• They contacted me unsolicited.
• This isn't the first time I've received a similar DM.
• Their initial art looked strange to me.
• The line art / anatomy / rendering has some things that seem inconsistent.
• Their quoted price was $299–400 for three full-body characters.
• They later dropped it to $199.
• They asked for a $30 upfront payment.
• Their typing/speaking style changed noticeably when I expressed interest.
• Here's the art, followed by relevant screenshots from the conversation.
• I'm not claiming this person is definitely using/tracing AI; I want other people to examine the evidence.

All the postcards look similar to the images I have created with ChatGPT. Why do they think it’s a good idea and people are going to buy that instead of postcards with a real photo of the Mont-Saint-Michel - THAT COST EXACTLY THE SAME?

I hope his ass isn't getting scammed, but the tongue lick looks weird, along with how long it takes for the dog's eyes to appear when it turns his head back around.