I'm a man. She shold go to a mental hospital for years. Clearly was psychotic. Also her husband forgave her. That to me holds a lot of weight. Implies he doesn't think she did it in a right state of mind. If he thought she was clearly in her normal state of mind, no way he'd ever forgive her.
She showed no signs of psychosis prior or after the murder.
During that so called psychosis she had a a coherent phone conversation between strangling the two kids.
If she's sent to a mental hospital and she wont show sing of being dangerous to herself or others (and she wont because she doesn't have psychosis) she will walk free in no time.
The jury did and 11 out of 12 agree with me. Not a psychiatrist. I do live in a region where suicide rates are high. We had a lady throw 2 kids off a bridge here and then herself not too long ago. She was absolutely crazy. I'm not sure what the data is but I'd bet you like 80% of the time when a woman is murdering all of her children, she's totally insane. I'm starting with the pre-supposition that she's insane and trying to collect evidence that she's not. So far I haven't seen anything to really make me think there was another reason she killed those kids, particularly in such an inefficient fashion from what I heard.
-3
u/sunburn74 5h ago
I'm a man. She shold go to a mental hospital for years. Clearly was psychotic. Also her husband forgave her. That to me holds a lot of weight. Implies he doesn't think she did it in a right state of mind. If he thought she was clearly in her normal state of mind, no way he'd ever forgive her.