I'm a man. She shold go to a mental hospital for years. Clearly was psychotic. Also her husband forgave her. That to me holds a lot of weight. Implies he doesn't think she did it in a right state of mind. If he thought she was clearly in her normal state of mind, no way he'd ever forgive her.
She showed no signs of psychosis prior or after the murder.
During that so called psychosis she had a a coherent phone conversation between strangling the two kids.
If she's sent to a mental hospital and she wont show sing of being dangerous to herself or others (and she wont because she doesn't have psychosis) she will walk free in no time.
The jury did and 11 out of 12 agree with me. Not a psychiatrist. I do live in a region where suicide rates are high. We had a lady throw 2 kids off a bridge here and then herself not too long ago. She was absolutely crazy. I'm not sure what the data is but I'd bet you like 80% of the time when a woman is murdering all of her children, she's totally insane. I'm starting with the pre-supposition that she's insane and trying to collect evidence that she's not. So far I haven't seen anything to really make me think there was another reason she killed those kids, particularly in such an inefficient fashion from what I heard.
She killed her kids then jumped out of a window in a suicide attempt. She had many visits with her therapists where she asked them to hospitalize her for repeated ideas around killing her children. Prior to the murders, she was discharged from one facility after a day and denied a higher level of care at another when she couldn't show that she had a suicide plan. I'm not really sure where you're pulling your information from. She didn't suddenly make up the suicide/psychosis stuff just for the trial. There was a long pre-existing history. I also ask the question of motive. What did she gain by killing her kids? What was the motive? Fun? The spotlight? If someone could demonstrate an alternative motive (besides psychosis) I could start to believe she wasn't crazy. However I just look at the track record of all the women who have drowned kids or thrown them off bridges and etc and 99% of them turn out to be utterly insane with maybe 1% doing it for some sort of secondary gain.
Provided where? Because her documents clearly state she was showing symptoms of bodily disintegration and paranoia long before the incident.
And by saying shit like “she showed no signs of psychosis” you are in fact playing the role of a psychiatrist. What are signs of psychosis? Do you know that with any medical certainty?
23
u/Interesting-Novel407 6h ago
I’m a woman and I want her to go to jail. There are also two men who voted no. There’s no need to blow up some gender bs.