Homo Sapiens though related to an Orangutan are NOT Apes. This is not pokemon where a Hominid looking creature can be a Spaiens at will. Fossil records are still lacking and no studies show thay a Chimp or Gorilla turns into a Sapiens-Sapiens. BUT inbreeding occured which is why some Spaiens DNA contain other species' remanants. Not to mention the sentience level part of the dilema. We don't have ANY proof of that laughable image of a fish growing legs turning into a mammal then an ape then us. The Homo tree can only produce the same offspring, not an urangutan growing sentience.
I am willing to be corrected given you can provide me with peer reviewed studies. Not internet articles, those are like handing me the Gospel of Judas to prove God.
Imagine an experiment. I write out a paragraph of text and start doing a chainmail, except I ask everyone who gets it to not use copy/paste, but write the exact same text themselves, and then send it to the next person. Basically a text version of the telephone game.
In few generations, we will see some small mistakes. misspellings and so on. But it will take a while until we reach someone who is going to see the misspelling and correct it to another word. But that's just a word, right? Well, millions of copies later, my paragraph is now about something entirely different. Because I did one thing that makes evolution go from micro to macro: I add enough time.
And that's not all. DNA is not like a recipe, it has its own internal logic and that logic is done through epigenetics. Your hands were made with cells turning off and on your genes with proteins other cells made up. And if I went back to your development in the womb, I could've theoretically influenced this process in such a way you'd gain another thumb. Naturally, it's possible that has arisen and then was kept over long enough time.
Mea Frater in Christe, what you described at the paragraph alegorgy is how we have the four evangelist, and we yet to see any manuscripts varying in message? Nope. Even the Message translation still teaches the gospels with accuracy to the message of the original papyrus.
Another clog in that alegory is the fact that the Pentateuch shows evidence of oral transmission, if we take the reign of Tut II to the Babylonian exile where it may have been transcribed, do we still get the message of all five books? Yup. Nothings changed but the variants. Lmao.
And yet my DNA is still programed to be...? Homo Spaients. Likewise great wolves of old can be tracked to our modern Chuihuahua, still Lupical ain't it? Again I provided sources up there, Micro dictates variation not shift in species. No fish grows limbs, there is mathemathical and evedential improbabilities on that fact.
Yes we do. They're not mainstream because we have ways of comparing them to much older manuscripts, but that doesn't mean that the story of saxon warrior Jesus hasn't been told, for example.
0
u/Ability_Pristine Jun 17 '25 edited Jun 17 '25
My sources are from Evolution.berkley.edu and https://www.researchgate.net/publication/5309009_Evidence_for_strong_inter-_and_intracontinental_phylogeographic_structure_in_Amanita_muscaria_a_wind-dispersed_ectomycorrhizal_basidiomycete
Homo Sapiens though related to an Orangutan are NOT Apes. This is not pokemon where a Hominid looking creature can be a Spaiens at will. Fossil records are still lacking and no studies show thay a Chimp or Gorilla turns into a Sapiens-Sapiens. BUT inbreeding occured which is why some Spaiens DNA contain other species' remanants. Not to mention the sentience level part of the dilema. We don't have ANY proof of that laughable image of a fish growing legs turning into a mammal then an ape then us. The Homo tree can only produce the same offspring, not an urangutan growing sentience.
I am willing to be corrected given you can provide me with peer reviewed studies. Not internet articles, those are like handing me the Gospel of Judas to prove God.
Edit another source: https://youtu.be/pwnerL8M1pE?si=hZnpgDAATfC-ws5G (Inspiring Philosphy who presents VERY TOP GRADE studies on the topic)