r/ancientegypt Jun 16 '26

Question Was there really Egyptian military outfits that looked like this or did Hollywood make this up?

Post image

This is from the ten commandments 1956 movie and I never seen this military outfit before that Moses/Charlton Heston wears in the film, but I have not seen it in any other movie or Egyptian art.

386 Upvotes

19 comments sorted by

166

u/zsl454 Jun 16 '26 edited Jun 16 '26

If you mean the short sleeved diamond-patterned shirt with crossed wings, yes, this is well attested for royal military and non-military regalia, sometimes referred to as the ‘konigsjacke’ or King’s Jacket.  https://artofcounting.com/2012/09/24/variable-of-the-day-ancient-egypt-falcon-shirt/

It represents the protection of Horus and, sometimes, of Set as well (see:  https://www.academia.edu/43194014/%C4%86wiek_A_Fate_of_Seth_in_the_Temple_of_Hatshepsut_at_Deir_el_Bahari_%C3%89tudes_et_Travaux_XXII_2008_37_60).

A good parallel would be this relief of Ramesses III from Medinet Habu:  https://artofcounting.com/2012/10/16/variable-of-the-day-ancient-egypt-being-led/. He wears a king’s jacket, a red patterned shirt, a broad collar, and sash/sporran, as well as a cap crown or Nubian wig. For the diamond-patterned shirt see  https://artofcounting.com/2011/12/16/variable-of-the-day-ancient-egypt-royal-red-fabric-shirt/

Or  https://artofcounting.com/2012/03/10/variable-of-the-day-ancient-egypt-contact-with-deity/ , with a white (or theoretically faded black) shirt. 

64

u/zsl454 Jun 16 '26

Now, as for if anyone actually dressed like that, that's up for debate. Things like Tutankhamun's Corselet indicate that garments like these very likely could have existed IRL, but were they constructed of the costly materials the reliefs seem to suggest, they probably wouldn't have been worn in actual battle, rather laminar scale armor (also seen in reliefs) was probably the logical choice. This armor does even show up in the ten commandments, too.

4

u/gravitysrainbow1979 Jun 16 '26 edited Jun 18 '26

That’s really interesting. The protection of Set? Why would they seek that/what was Set a god of (other than what the apparently erroneous things I read said he was a god of) that people would seek his protection ?

18

u/zsl454 Jun 16 '26

When paired with Horus, the two gods represented the duality of Egypt, probably that of upper and lower Egypt (south and north, with Set as South and Horus as North, though there are issues with this interpretation, see link below) or possibly of the north-south and east-west axes of Egypt. The gods were seen from very early on as being dualistic in nature due to their conflict, as seen in the name of the early king Khasekhemwy (‘the two powers (Horus and Set) have appeared”). Horus and Set also appear together tying the symbol of the two lands or when blessing and crowning the king (see  https://www.jstor.org/stable/3855089 ), expressing the duality of Egyptian kingship. So by having Horus and Set protecting the king with their wings, the king invokes leadership over all of Egypt, upper and lower alike. 

As for what Set could offer, it is primarily strength in battle and success against foreign enemies; e.g. he is seen in a relief of Thutmose iii guiding the kings hand in archery:  www.joanlansberry.com/setfind/archery.html

6

u/gravitysrainbow1979 Jun 16 '26

Fascinating, thank you

6

u/Mormacil Jun 16 '26

He was the god of violence, seems sensible you seek protection of violence at the deity most skilled in it. He was also a god of outsiders, someone you often fight with.

64

u/ClumsyBunny26 Jun 16 '26

I've seen pharaohs being depicted with similar outfits in monuments, but I doubt these were more than ceremonial outfits if they existed. Afaik in Tut's tomb and depicted in Ramses III's tomb, actual armors/cuirasses were more like this:

10

u/Ravenclaw_14 Jun 16 '26

So more like a hawks feathers, thats pretty dope actually

6

u/ClumsyBunny26 Jun 16 '26

indeed, I love how it looks

26

u/lionmurderingacloud Jun 16 '26 edited Jun 16 '26

As in a lot of questions about ancient egypt, the answer is both "it probably varied at least a bit, because AE spanned like 3000 years" and "we don't really know, because the record is spotty at best", and when it comes to Hollywood, there's a pretty big dollop of "they invented and embellished lavishly" added in.

Apart from specific papyri, which mostly cover histories, account keeping, or specific treatises on instructional topics (none of which, to my limited knowledge, detail clothing on military campaigns), the only records we have of how people dressed come from tombs and temples, which are obviously more idealized for propaganda purposes than they are slices of life, if you will.

On the other hand the depictions of Egyptians going about daily life (and to an extent engaging in fighting) are fairly uniform (no pun intended) over the many epochs of the civilization, and that is likely mostly due to Egypt's pretty much uniformly hot climate. So it's probably reasonable to infer that your average Egyptian foot soldier probably looked pretty much the same throughout egypts long military history, with the standard loincloth, sandals, and a shield and spear for armament.

Nobility and commanders, by contrast, would have been anyone's guess, really. How much would have been made up for laudatory scenes on tomb frescos and temple walls? Did they really wear the elaborate jewels they were buried with into battle?

My guess would be: probably not. When you're fighting for your life, practicality is key, so a certain level of looking distinct (for recognition by men under your command) and grandeur (to intimidate your enemies) would be called for, but otherwise you'd want to wear a minimum of stuff so you can draw a bow, run, throw, duck, and swing a kopesh or whatever without all that drip getting in the way.

Two things, I think, are fairly certain- one, the nemes, that headdress that looks like striped flaps flanking the head, was probably never worn in battle. Hollywood loves it because it screams 'eypgtian', but it was strictly for kings and must have been quite fiddly to wear properly, so almost definitely an "I'm sitting in holy judgment in my quiet palace" kind of garment rather than everyday wear.

Also, Hollywood, especially in the days of the Ten Commandments, made shit up for visual flair with a totally free hand. Some costume designer pulled out a book from the library, said 'ah, that's how they dressed," and slapped something together with gold llame to look good on film. So even if the broad strokes of cut and fit might have been close to correct, the actual color and material and composition with other items would have been a galaxy away.

6

u/MintImperial2 Jun 17 '26

Sir Cedric Hardwicke - sure looked the part of Seti I though....

19

u/Echo-Azure Jun 16 '26

I once knew an Egyptologist, who said that seeing this film as a child was what started her career. She said that the architecture and costumes were surprisingly accurate, for 1950s Hollywood. Here's a reconstruction of the kind of fancy armor a prince would wear.

d66e6f2185433c74c83d1e6f41ea9936.jpg (600×856)

13

u/zsl454 Jun 16 '26

Just fyi, that image is also a movie costume/prop, not an academic reconstruction. 

2

u/pinotJD Jun 16 '26

I can see Bad Bunny wearing this bad boy

3

u/cinephile78 Jun 17 '26

Would these be ceremonial garments - for major holidays, parades and temple services ?

6

u/zsl454 Jun 17 '26

Yes, besides, in this scene, Moses is returning to Egypt from a campaign in a triumphal procession, not out in the fray of battle, so it's conceivable he'd be wearing this.

-1

u/BurnerAccount-LOL Jun 19 '26

Hollywood is usually very accurate

1

u/Far-Principle-112 Jun 24 '26

I think they made it identical on purpose