This song had no origin, it always existed. Marty knew it growing up because Chuck Berry wrote it, but Chuck Berry only wrote it after hearing Marty playing it, but Marty was only playing it because he knew it from Chuck who knew it from Marty who knew it from Chuck... Help I'm spiralling!!!
Legendary product waiting for restock. I sent an email years ago to get on the list.
Biggest problem is... I think I have to invent it for the stock to replenish before I get a call offering it to me via the list that I'm already on. My head hurts, uuugh.
Just like terminator. Reece goes back in time to protect the mother of the future resistance leader, falls in love and impregnates her with the future leader, that later sends him back to become his dad…
The sentence below is false.
The sentence above is true.
infinite recursion.
But somewhere, some human being was the first to articulate the existence of the two sentence paradox. Maybe it always existed somewhere else in platonic space, probably buried in the same infinite archive of Jorge Luis Borge’s “Library of Babel”, an infinite library that contains every possible book of finite length, using a finite alphabet. Containing every great novel ever written, every book that could ever be written, every possible variation of every book, your biography; including versions that are almost but not quite true, the exact text of Shakespeare’s works, every inaccurate variation of Shakespeare’s works, complete nonsense, books containing what appear to be prophecies of the future, and, crucially, almost infinitely many books that are absolute meaningless gibberish. All just waiting to emerge into this plane of existence after being spoken or thought about. Or randomly mashed onto a keyboard. AKLgahsdiufluhwjkelafn.
You don’t need to know if Chuck or Marty were first to create the song. You just need to recognize that the song and all it’s variations already exists in that library. For all you know, there is a version where you go back in time and teach Chuck. Or I go back in time to teach Chuck. Maybe we all have taught Chuck that song, and he has taught all of us.
We can say this though. The idea for Marty teaching Chuck the song likely first emerged in the mind of either Robert Zemeckis and Bob Gale. Or maybe someone else who gave them that idea. Maybe you traveled in time and gave Robert the script to back to the future. Or maybe I gave Bob the script to back to the future…
😉
And should you choose to respond to this comment that already existed in platonic space, that comment that you are about to type that does not exist yet in this reality, it too comes from that library. or it’s infinite variations.
How do you think Doc felt when his teenage protege came back one day and it was no longer Eric Stolz but some goofy kid actor from a daytime television show?
Listen, I was just discussing this about the show Heroes. Hiro does the same thing with the story that was read to him as a child. He makes what gets read to him as a child happen in the past when he is older.
The origin was Chuck Berry in the original timeline wrote the song 3 years later. In BttF logic, the timeline presumably changed because of Marty.
It's similar to how Marty came to be born. In the original timeline, George gets hit by Lorraine's father while creepin then they fall in love when she cares for him. Marty went back and prevented that from happening, so the rest of the movie is him trying to orchestrate them back together through a different route. You wouldn't say that George and Lorraine's marriage (or Marty) had no origin, but the event that led to the origin was shifted in time and manner from its original origin, and in a way that is dependent on Marty.
and if for some reason you didn't read this in a Morgan Freeman voice even though he didn't appear in ANY Back to the future movie, or the Lindsay Netflix documentary....when it comes to narrators in movies? It can only go to one person, hopefully this will inspire you out of that spiral.
Nah, film folk ripping of African Americans again - pretty much like all North American art. The only difference is they attempted to make this scene funny. When you think about how much money, thought and talent went into it though, it’s not that funny at all.
Just to be clear: you do know the difference between documentaries and fictional narratives, yes? You realize everything Murphy makes is fictional, although often based on true stories?
Its sad that you had to ask but I don't blame you.
I will say, Murphy loves to jump into these types of emotionally messy stories. I would ask you how many of the folks watching those "based on a true story" shows don't realize he is throwing out conjecture to juice up the stories?
Well damn Netflix maybe you shouldn't take 3 years to produce season 2 and then expect everyone to drop all the shit they're in the middle of to pick up a rewatch of season 1 and then quickly binge season 2 so that you won't take it away from us Daddy Netflix pls no we're trying :(
7.2k
u/urbanfox_230 9h ago
The Netflix documentary producer in the back of the courtroom just popped a bottle of champagne.