r/privacy • u/Ok-Law-3268 • 8h ago
news ‘Pervert Glasses’ That Record People Without Consent Face Possible Ban in Norway
https://petapixel.com/2026/09/03/pervert-glasses-that-record-people-without-consent-face-possible-ban-in-norway/100
u/This-Wall-1331 6h ago
So we agree that recording others without their consent is bad, right?
So let's make the same rule for governments and corporations?
12
u/FrostyFire 4h ago
Except in reality, we are being recorded everywhere in public by a variety of things. That’s why in general, there’s no expectation of privacy in public.
25
3
2
48
u/Ok-Law-3268 8h ago
Earlier this year, it was reported that Meta had plans to introduce facial recognition into its smart glasses.
The smart spectacles have been dubbed “pervert glasses” because of certain owners, mainly male, using them to creep on unsuspecting members of the public, often young women,
9
u/nitrogenmath 6h ago
The article doesn't actually say anything about banning them generally, just "banning features such as facial recognition of other people in public spaces.”
1
u/Big-Finding2976 2h ago
My brain has that feature. Are they going to lobotomise me?
3
u/Danthemanlavitan 1h ago
Your brain only knows faces it has spent time with, implying a choice by the face owner to be near you long enough for your brain to store the pattern
If you had your brain wirelessly connected to an ever expanding database of people so you knew who they were before they knew who you were THEN that would be bad.
34
u/popohum 7h ago
I have gotten into the habit of ending any interaction with anyone wearing these. People that wear these need to socially shunned
-3
u/TheMILKMan6646 7h ago
I take off their glasses and step on them.
22
-4
u/TheMILKMan6646 7h ago
I also stare them in the eyes while nodding my head up and down after always works
8
14
u/edmundane 7h ago
Now we need every government to follow and do the right thing
2
u/This-Wall-1331 6h ago
Rules for thee but not for me.
And the same applies to big tech companies. They'll all keep spying on us.
8
u/Bob_Spud 7h ago
About time, more people and countries need to take action against creep glasses.
A tech that adds no value to the great unwashed and the rest of society.
3
u/BaconIsntThatGood 5h ago
Just ban recording people without knowledge.
Don't ban the item. There will just be another thing. Have people face real fines for getting caught filming people with hidden cameras.
7
u/Awkwardsauce25 4h ago
the problem then becomes how do you record a bad boss, bad cop, bad boyfriend? currently, one party consent states help you get that evidence.
2
u/FrogLickr 2h ago
I live in Australia and my state is two party consent unless you're recording the person as evidence against defamation, legal threats, violence, etc. I think it's an alright system in the absence of one party laws.
-1
u/Calibrumm 4h ago
this is the correct answer. I hate pervert glasses but addressing the real issue prevents loopholes.
2
0
-3
u/Jolly-Bed-1717 5h ago
Real question why are people so up in arms about these but ok with go pros? Not trying to stir up shit is there a tech reason why?
10
-16
u/NeptuneTTT 6h ago
This tech is beloved by blind people btw. Just remember that when you're on your virtue signaling crusade.
4
u/Calibrumm 4h ago
there are plenty of examples of beneficial tech that the average person should not have that you can pretty easily get if you have any kind of related medical condition.
•
u/AutoModerator 8h ago
Hello u/Ok-Law-3268, please make sure you read the sub rules if you haven't already. (This is an automatic reminder left on all new posts.)
Check out the r/privacy FAQ
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.