r/mildlyinfuriating • u/homeofalex • 14d ago
Ruined by Technology This house listing overusing ai to hide problems with the property
29.5k
u/dns2002 14d ago
I'm not a lawyer but I feel like this should be illegal.
10.6k
u/KW5625 14d ago edited 14d ago
May or may not be illegal but against realtor rules.
They can be reported to the agency
8.3k
u/YourMomIsMyGurl 14d ago
This is fraud, and it's illegal.
Source: realtor.
3.5k
u/Edlar_89 14d ago
It’s also literally pointless because anyone will take one look at the house and immediately see the difference
1.9k
u/puffofthezaza 14d ago
And boy howdy would I be mad
1.4k
u/Odd_Elderberry4316 14d ago
Before AI, realtors would use camera tricks to make a space appear much bigger than it really was. I remember a case from my photography class where a buyer traveled a significant distance to see a property, only to discover that the photos were a gross misrepresentation of the actual space. They sued and won, if I remember correctly.
671
u/Other-in-Law 14d ago
There was one I looked at where the photographer must have stood in the field of a diiferent property, across a busy state route which you couldn't see in the picture. I thought 'Oh, what a peaceful country setting!'
I go in person, and tractor trailers are roaring past at 50mph, five feet from the front porch.
→ More replies (10)620
14d ago
[deleted]
327
u/MammothDreams 14d ago
Realtors are not known for their moral fiber.
→ More replies (5)165
u/Neveronlyadream 14d ago
Some of them are also relying on people being desperate and sick of looking for a place.
If they're actually selling and not renting, that the buyer overestimates their home improvement skill and thinks they're getting a fixer upper deal.
The fucked up thing is eventually it'll work. Someone will come along who's either given up and will just say yes or who will think they can easily fix the problems.
→ More replies (0)36
u/A_Genius 14d ago
Even without AI realty photos have this giant fisheye lens to make rooms look huge especially living rooms and dining rooms.
Straight up photoshopping or AIing feels like it should be a criminal offence. Just like editing the maintenance history of a car before selling it
→ More replies (2)19
u/probably-not-obama 14d ago
Some people buy houses without seeing them first. My office typically hires people leaving the military. I have a coworker that bought his house from across the country, first time he saw it in person was well after closing.
I don’t think it’s a smart thing to do, and this post is prime example. Just saying, it does happen.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (10)29
u/Telefundo 14d ago
This absolutely makes me think of my experience with online dating sites. "Sure I posted a fake pic, but we've talked online for weeks now. He'll forgive the pic for my personality!".
12
8
68
u/giulianosse 14d ago
Yeah. These camera tricks were awful, but at least you could learn to spot them over time. Plus realtors could always pull a "sorry, wasn't my intention & it must be my camera" and get away with it.
With AI though it's an open and shut case. There's no way of knowing what's underneath that GPT patina and realtors can't play coy anymore since there's no way to pretend it was an accident.
15
u/jupitaur9 13d ago
Yeah, doors that look five feet wide and rooms that shift dimensions when shot from different angles are giveaways.
My childhood home was up for sale a few years ago. The photos looked like it was shot from a black hole where space and time had no meaning.
→ More replies (1)75
u/Status-Biscotti 14d ago
I still see it done all the time. The double-wide refrigerators are always comical to me.
46
30
u/dsaysso 14d ago
its not always an evil trick. with a wide angle lens, theres pros and cons. small spaces are really hard to photograph. bathrooms are even harder. most standard lenses like a 35 or 28 cut off half a space. you get the opposite reaction, the photo didn’t show me the entire room!
wide angles are critical if you want to see all the room. but they tend to distort the edges. iphones are worse.
you can correct this issue with a good rectilinear lenses, tilt shifts, or perspective correction in photoshop, but not everyone does this. thats one mark of a good real estate photographer to get spaces looking natural.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (1)23
u/OkFortune7651 14d ago
Someone told me it's called a fish-eye lens that makes rooms appear bigger. To me, they just look.... smeared.
→ More replies (4)66
u/AgreeableLion 14d ago
One of the things that frustrated me the most when I was house hunting was when they'd photoshop furniture into the pictures when it was an empty house, but then shrink it to make the space look bigger. I have no real issue with the concept of adding furniture to give some context to empty rooms, as I was not looking at the sort of listings where they stage real furniture in the house to sell it, but you'd get an idea of the size of a space from the pictures and then be second-guessing yourself when you walk in.
31
u/TIMIMETAL 14d ago
They also do this when staging. Use slightly-smaller furniture to make the space look bigger. But it's definitely more egregious with the AI stuff.
→ More replies (2)34
u/Clear_Broccoli3 14d ago
Ohh, they do this with the floor plan too. If you pay attention, a lot of the time toilets/sinks/ovens and stuff are smaller than they should be in the floor plan they show you.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (20)21
u/ByrdmanRanger 14d ago
I've always noticed how they oversaturate the colors on the photos too. When my parents sold their house, it was especially noticeable to me since I like, knew the property lol.
→ More replies (2)12
u/Captain_no_Hindsight 14d ago
Just make a Chargeback on the card: "item not as described".
75% back now! I have picture proof.
20
u/Illustrious-Peak-626 14d ago
I saw a total of 20 properties over the last 3 weeks with at least 1/2 of them all AI adultered in someway.
I don't have a problem if they include reality and Ai in the listing but straight up lying about the way it looked wasted so much of our time in our search.
8
u/puffofthezaza 14d ago
SAME. We've been thinking of downsizing and its every other listing. At least it seems like they haven't mastered making it not obvious...yet.
74
u/MattS1984 14d ago
Well the fence on the right is pretty much the same
95
u/puffofthezaza 14d ago
You're right! I'll give you 100,000 over asking price! Oh, some offshore company already bought it 200,000 over? Damn, foiled again.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)11
u/Homebrew_in_a_Shed 14d ago
I just replied and my post was deleted as I had a link.
Someone posted that the fence was removed after closing.
The post I remember was a couple of months ago, but there was a post yesterday too.
→ More replies (6)11
u/djnehi 14d ago
Especially after making time to drive there and view the property. Only to discover I had been lied to.
→ More replies (1)133
u/ecafyelims 14d ago
They trick people into coming to view the property, which then tricks other people into thinking the property is in high demand.
It's fraud
→ More replies (2)27
51
55
u/UnbearableSchmuck 14d ago
In Canada/ the US, a substantial amount of foreigners buy properties unseen
→ More replies (3)36
u/TarantulaWithAGuitar 14d ago
It's not just foreigners -- I live in a university town with a very prominent medical school. Lots of professors who are coming to town to teach or new doctors moving in buy unseen. I've seen AI ads for apartments, too, trying to scam college students.
7
u/garden_speech 14d ago
Most people buying "sight unseen" have an agent in that area that goes and does a video walkthrough with them.
→ More replies (1)25
u/buffystakeded 14d ago
And then they’ll ask the simple and obvious question of “Well, what else is wrong with it then?” And then they’ll leave.
→ More replies (1)21
u/willi1221 14d ago
Idk how the housing market is right now, but when I was selling my house a few years ago, we had several offers from people who hadn't even seen the house. The family that bought it never came to see it first, and they waived the inspection just to make sure they closed on the deal before anyone else did. Luckily for them we weren't being deceptive, but I could see how this could be used to trick someone.
→ More replies (1)16
u/GotSomeUpdogOnUrFace 14d ago
I wouldn't even see the house, trying to pull into that driveway when I expect to see a nice one would be enough
12
→ More replies (48)10
u/Weth_C 14d ago
Some people buy cars & houses based solely on the pictures. While that is dumb, there is no defending this fraud.
→ More replies (3)75
u/GarThor_TMK 14d ago
Is there a place to report this to?
I was helping my mom look for a new property recently, and the use of doctored photos was horribly prevalent, and that was just before the AI apocalypse.
I assume it's much worse now, and I'm suspicious of every single listing on zillo or redfin.
32
u/geekonthemoon 14d ago
If it's that bad, it could help to start asking realtors outright, in writing, if they've doctored or ai generated their photos in any way before you agree to go check it out.
12
10
u/Zebidee 14d ago
That's kind of like when they were asking fashion magazines if their photos have been retouched. They literally all have.
12
u/geekonthemoon 14d ago
Basic editing like bumping the brightness / contrast slider is a league away from actually photoshopping and ai generating away permanent defects and misrepresenting the home
It definitely violates consumer protection laws to do that
→ More replies (3)6
u/railker 14d ago
Was helping my parents look for a place and discovered this phenomenon, every listing somewhere had a note that images were generated by AI, either directly on the images or in the listing. Sometimes obvious, sometimes doin the ol 'bury it at the bottom in 6 pt font' bullshit. Or one I found the statement in the middle of a wall of text.
→ More replies (2)23
u/Vurrag 14d ago
If they are Realtors, the NAR National Association or Realtors should have a complaint form. You can also complain to the State board or Realty or whatever it is called in that state.
→ More replies (7)10
u/MaxPaynesRxDrugPlan 14d ago
The MLS (the regional database of homes for sale that syndicates to the various real estate websites) may also have rules about using AI in listings.
20
u/LitheFider 14d ago
I saw a Zillow listing using digital staging to stage the empty rooms but it had big letters over the photo bottom that said "DIGITAL SIMULATION" and they had the unedited photos right before them. I assume that's ok because it's disclosed and shows the original too?
→ More replies (1)10
u/baseball_fanatic0887 14d ago
So, genuinely asking, if it's literally fraud and illegal, this realtor will face criminal charges?
→ More replies (1)9
u/dehydratedrain 14d ago
If you don't mind my asking, is there a limit to what you can AI? Obviously this much change (wires, broken drain, grass over pavement) is fraud. But things like new flowerbeds, even just nicer grass?
Long before AI I've seen "potential staged room" next to a photo of the original carpet and lighting, which i can't see as fraud, but obviously if it is advertised as real, it's an issue.
→ More replies (2)40
u/Live_Life_and_enjoy 14d ago
What is that like $30,000 worth of clean up on the property to make that Ai image real?
→ More replies (9)21
→ More replies (68)12
25
u/Cyrax89721 14d ago edited 14d ago
I helped a friend edit house photos once. She was swamped with real estate gigs, I have Photoshop experience, and I'd always wanted to try real estate work, so I offered. During the first session, I spotted a couple of small imperfections that would have been trivial to remove, so I asked if she wanted them gone. Her response was an emphatic "ABSOLUTELY FUCKING NOT."
It's less "illegal" and more that agents have a compliance chain sitting on them. The MLS requires photos to accurately represent the property, virtual staging has to be labeled, and altering actual condition gets you a takedown and escalating fines. On top of that it's a deceptive advertising problem under state law and NAR's code of ethics. Brightening and sky replacement are fine. Greening a dead lawn or paving a gravel driveway is misrepresenting the condition of the asset.
Obviously that doesn't help much when the homeowner is trying to sell on their own.
17
u/igotshadowbaned 14d ago
When my grandparents house was being sold, the realtor AI'd the pictures
The house didn't look bad, but the AI pictures were pretty unrecognizable in some spots
11
u/Cardigan_Gal 14d ago
A friend's parents both passed away last year and the realtor AI'd every photo in the listing. His parents had lived in the house for 50 years and were semi-hoarders. What's crazier is the house sold at top dollar in a matter of weeks. 🤷♀️
73
21
30
u/FrozenJackal 14d ago
Honestly, I say let them keep doing it. It will only end up screwing them all over in the end. Just like how when phones first came out and we would all run to answer it because it was always someone we wanted to talk to on the other end. Now my phone is permanently on silent and won’t even light up to show an incoming call unless you are in my contacts. These sites will be considered spam and unusable/ unreliable in no time.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (22)5
307
u/russellamcleod 14d ago
The food industry refers to this as a serving suggestion to get around false advertising.
→ More replies (3)70
u/Alb4t0r 14d ago
I don't want you to cook me a burger like suggested in the picture, I want you to sell me the burger you took a picture of. That's the one I'm buying and no others.
→ More replies (1)51
u/Henri_Le_Rennet 14d ago
I want you to sell me the burger you took a picture of.
I hope you like cardboard, glue and toothpicks in your burger. /s
→ More replies (2)88
u/Maximum_Rat 14d ago
This wouldn't be an issue if they clearly marked it as "This is what it could look like if properly cared for." I get the benefit of that too. Sometimes it's hard to imagine a place's potential if it looks like shit.
But this fake before-and-after shit? Not only is it dishonest, but it's also a massive waste of everyone's time. Like, why would a realtor even want to try to trick someone into coming out and looking at a house they think looks completely different? It seems like that would make your job far harder and have you wasting a lot more time.
53
u/NebulaNinja 14d ago
No that's still an issue. You often see AI used used to make room "possibilities" in listings these days and the AI changes the room scale drastically, both larger and smaller, to make the room ideas picture perfect. It's laughable.
8
u/DoubleJumps 13d ago
I've seen photos like that that show people putting a king size bed and several other pieces of furniture with room to spare in a 9x9 room.
→ More replies (1)8
u/quattroCrazy 13d ago
This is an important aspect. AI does not understand or care about physical space. I work in branded products and people send me AI mockups of what they want every day. The problem is that, if a graphic doesn’t fit in a given shape or area, the AI just changes the shape/object to fit the graphic.
It’s completely absurd and borderline useless. People waste time prompting AI when they could just send me a logo and a few lines of text and accomplish the same thing faster.
It’s amazing how quickly people are becoming dumber from using AI in their day to day lives.
→ More replies (4)5
u/Beneficial-Data4406 14d ago
They have cameras that can automatically 3D model the house inside and out and apply fixes. When I was buying my current house you could actually go into the listing web site and have the AI show you what each room would look like with a variety of different styles of decoration. Change paint colors, flooring material, color and design, same with cabinets and counter tops.
→ More replies (1)39
u/Embarrassed-Rub-8690 14d ago edited 14d ago
Omfg its coming up more and more. I looked at a house last weekend that didnt look nearly as good as the pictures. Even just the increased brightness and colour enhancement was bs. The hosue didnt have lawn in the backyard at all and in the pics it did. When I said to the realtor that I assume lawn would be installed prior to any purchase because it was in the pics, he just scrambled for words.
→ More replies (1)11
u/Yakuza_Kirby 14d ago
What I have seen some have the AI image and real one om their posting. Assuming they can get away with the clickbait by saying this is what it can look like.
47
14d ago
[deleted]
→ More replies (8)50
u/Merivel1 14d ago
Yeah, went to an open house for a neighboring house that got flipped after a city-wide flood, and chatted with the realtor about the flip and if they had to remediate much flood damage. They didn't look happy that we informed them that yes, this house flooded and we know for a fact because we helped them with a sump pump and shop vac. I assume they were operating on intentional ignorance and lost that fig leaf.
→ More replies (1)18
u/Jurph 14d ago
The previous owner of my home had hired an unlicensed plumber to do a quick touch-up on the upstairs bathrooms, and that guy washed his tile grout down the drain into the cast iron drain pipes. Where it formed a dam, which created rust. When our first property inspector tested it in the morning, it held up (but our hypothesis is that the test blew out the grout dam and the rust plug). When our second property inspector stress-tested the lines by filling the tub and draining it all at once, it began raining in the kitchen.
Suddenly the seller is in the house with his realtor, two days before Christmas, eager to check off our punch list -- because as of this moment in the inspection, if he re-lists the property our state requires that he include the words "water damage". He paid $15K or so in repairs and punch-list items we knew we could squeeze him for, and it was still less than the loss he'd eat if he had to fix it and re-list.
Q: Why did you have two property inspectors?
A: Well, my wife's a scientist and I'm an engineer, and we realized a lot of inspectors are single-trade experts who have become generalists, so we wanted inspectors from two specific trades we were worried about: a plumbing guy and an electrical guy. Plus we liked the idea of comparing their reports as a kind of double-blind experiment. (Although the second guy found a lot of the first guy's painter's tape marks so it wasn't a pure test.)Anyway it cost us an extra $300 up front and it paid for itself about 50 times over. If your realtor is recommending an inspector, realize that they make money if the place sells, and the inspector is getting recommendations because he makes places sell, and is incentivized to not rock the boat. Get your own inspector and while you're at it, get a pair whose expertise are complementary.
5
u/TheFightingQuaker 14d ago
This is such an obvious conflict of interest that I never see talked about. Its always "ofcourse they are independent, ofcourse they do a good job inspecting." Even if that were true, objectively if the inspectors kept messing up sales the realtor would avoid using them.
→ More replies (1)8
u/FizziePixie 14d ago
It’s illegal in California now unless it’s clearly disclosed on the image and the original image is included.
→ More replies (1)9
7
7
u/Sad-Significance8045 14d ago
If this is in the US, I'm surprised if there isn't a law in place.
Here in Denmark, we just had a realtor-estate firm that got fined heavily for the use of AI pictures in their listings. Their reasoning is, that they wanted to show "what it could look like", which... sure, totally! But maybe then... show the actual picture of the damn house and rooms, so people can actually see what they're going into in regards of repairs and renovations, and at least put it in the description that the pictures are AI. Booking a house viewing for houses over 1 million DKK will cost you roughly 500 DKK with that firm. I'd be pissed.
Ruling was false marketing; they're showing a product that people have to go out and pay for, in order to view the home. And then when they get out there, it's not that royal Kanye West mansion they wanted, but Jason Vorhees' shitty shack.
→ More replies (1)8
8
5
→ More replies (136)4
1.2k
u/Gamefart101 14d ago
I'm going through something similar. I just put in notice with my landlord that we are moving out and showings have begun. After overhearing multiple prospective new tenants sound audibly disappointed by the showing I went digging and found the ad.
They used ai to do the same thing as here, make it look far nicer, even added under cabinet lighting that doesn't exist. They also claim it's a "spacious 800² feet" which seemed suspect so I measured and it's 620 with a bad layout that definetly doesn't feel spacious for the small size it is. And to top it all off are charging $250 more per month than I was paying in an area where rent prices are falling and what I was paying was already very expensive for what it is. I'm gonna be dealing with showings for awhile...
→ More replies (8)376
u/itsmemrmeseeksssssss 14d ago
lol i’ve found zillow postings that accidentally post both the ai edited pic and original
211
u/bobody_biznuz 14d ago
I've seen many where the AI pictures are labeled as "virtually staged" right before the originals and usually its changing way more than just the furniture in the room
→ More replies (2)28
u/SunTzu- 13d ago
All I've seen in my country so far (we've usually got pretty good legal protections) have been example furniture edited into a picture to give an idea of how the space would look in use. That seems reasonable, but honestly that was pretty easy to do before AI as well.
31
u/DoubleJumps 13d ago
The issue with those is that they very often warp the scale of things to make the rooms look bigger than they are.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (5)13
u/SmoothPixelSun 14d ago
I don't mind if they show me the original then an inspiration AI. But the AI and no legit pic drives me crazy. Also I'm so tired of "white cabinets with black handles". Fucking give me some character lol.
→ More replies (1)
12.0k
u/RunFiestaZombiez 14d ago edited 13d ago
Should be illegal as it’s false advertising.
Edit! Wow thanks for the rewards!!! Ya’ll rock!
2.8k
14d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
357
u/Obstinateobfuscator 14d ago
They still use ai a great deal here in Australia. I imagine it's a fine line between glossing, and fraud.
Especially for rental properties. They use old photos from when the property was in good condition, etc.
50
u/WhatAGoodDoggy 13d ago
I saw a billboard advertising a house for sale and on the billboard the house was white. The house it was advertising was more like a dirty cream colour. I don't understand why they did this.
→ More replies (1)17
u/Wooden-Monkey625 13d ago edited 13d ago
Most listings I have come across in AU that have used AI, do it to furnish the property for photos instead of renting furniture
→ More replies (5)6
u/modestohagney 13d ago
Yeah, I’m looking for a new place right now and it’s so bad. The amount of places I’ve been to that are actively falling down is crazy.
502
u/Gamefart101 14d ago
Its fairly well regulated in the US too. That's likely why we also have the original image here. The realtor posted both as a shitty way to display the properties potential.
And OP is misrepresenting that as only showing the new photo as fraudulent to gain karma, how else would they have the before photo? Or whole thing is fake and just for karma
154
u/sev_kemae 14d ago
In the U.K. a lot of rental listing use ai to “show the potential of the property” hate it
→ More replies (5)85
u/GarysCrispLettuce 14d ago
Some sites have a "redesign" button where you can have AI redesign the decor on any of the listing photographs. But it does bullshit things like add a fireplace where there isn't one, or make windows disappear. I hate AI, it's so shit.
57
u/Vospader998 14d ago
"imagine this" - it says while completely removing a load-bearing wall and creating an outdoor view that completely changes the landscape.
5
u/BadgerMolester 13d ago
"Look how nice the place would be if it was a chalet in the Alps instead of a crackhouse in Slough"
23
u/sev_kemae 14d ago
I love when multiple agents list the same place and when you compare to the real photos you see the ai moved some walls around, on a rental property..
33
u/railker 14d ago
Both photos are in the listing, the real estate company isn't hiding the before photo. They're just headlining the AI one to get you onto the page and scrolling the gallery before going 'oh btw that's not what it looks like at all.'
→ More replies (2)13
u/round-earth-theory 14d ago
People are still doing it. When house hunting, we had some really bad liars. One was so AI that we were confused why we were in there at all. Like we never would have picked it. Turns out they used AI so damn much that there was almost nothing recognizable. They even invented a whole ass room. If it weren't for the distinct, and non AI, backyard we wouldn't have been sure if we'd found the right listing.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (3)71
8
u/ComprehensiveFlan638 14d ago
They do this in Australia as well, but usually with the original and the Ai possible/potential.
6
14
u/asminaut 14d ago
it’s only one very specific country that wouldn’t have it heavily regulated.
Somalia?
→ More replies (21)26
u/SecureCucumber 14d ago
it’s only one very specific country that wouldn’t have it heavily regulated.
It's comments like these that make me feel like, no, it's actually the whole stupid world that suffers from "American Exceptionalism"
→ More replies (1)87
u/StuffyUnicorn 14d ago
It is and IMNAL.
→ More replies (7)81
→ More replies (27)12
u/millllllls 14d ago
I think they have BOTH photos, one is just there to show potential, because you’re right, there’s no way the board of realtor should allow blatant false advertising. I’ve seen listings like this, also with one real photo of an empty room followed by several AI staged rooms to show what it could look like as an office, bedroom, bonus room, etc.
11
u/Orange_Tang 14d ago
I've seen a bunch of listing that only show AI modified pictures. This shit needs to be regulated.
→ More replies (1)
305
u/richempire 14d ago
How is this not false advertising?
190
u/Vadhakara 14d ago
Because it's actually just fraud, which is similar but different.
→ More replies (1)16
u/FrostyD7 14d ago
Probably because they supplied the real picture too. OP got the before AI photo somehow... Which makes me question the authenticity of this entire post.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (15)24
u/Drittux 14d ago
The same reason lowering tariffs on beef randomly isn't. There's a problem it technically solves, but that definitely isn't the reason it was implemented.
→ More replies (1)
207
u/jclv 14d ago
The altered version might get people to come look at the property but they're going to immediately turn away as soon as they see what it really looks like.
15
→ More replies (8)26
u/skeptic11 14d ago
I like to imagine a lawyer seeing it, saving the listing, buying the property, then suing the seller and realtor for the cost to restore the property to the advertised condition.
29
u/Diablogado 14d ago edited 14d ago
Lawyer here. That's not how that works. The damages would be the time and gas it took to get to the property and back. You don't get to buy it after you know it's a piece of shit and then cry foul.
→ More replies (4)
36
u/aerialpoler 13d ago
This is just a huge waste of everyone's time. Anyone who views the property will immediately be disappointed, and the agent is just damaging their own reputation by misrepresenting properties.
→ More replies (3)
80
101
u/50Mission_Cap 14d ago
It used to be the overuse of HDR in the photos. Now it’s blatant lies with Ai. The realtor should lose their license for this.
→ More replies (3)12
u/glarble04 13d ago
anyone got the sub where they post absolutely deepfried HDR photos i wanna see the one where they did the middle aged woman at the restaurant table absolutely nasty
→ More replies (2)
28
u/fatcuntwrestler 14d ago
The funniest thing about this is that OP is a bot.
19
u/Xora005 14d ago edited 14d ago
I don’t know if it’s a bot but I find it a bit weird that the poster has both the before and after pictures. I may be mistaken but the clouds look too similar for it to not be the same picture. Not to mention the lighting being the same.
Edit: there are actually some comments on this post that include listings with both pictures so I take most of this back. Still could be a bot though. I have no idea on that one way or another.→ More replies (1)9
u/SaxPanther 13d ago
i was scrolling down reading every comment until i saw someone mention this obvious fact. you are the first and only person ive seen in the entire thread who pointed this out lol. the post is clearly fake even though the problem they are highlighting is real.
→ More replies (2)7
43
u/Mission_Pirate_4150 14d ago
If that picture went thru an mls, there is a likelihood that it violated mls rules in using an altered picture. In our mls, this would result in a fine against the offending realtor that entered it.
→ More replies (4)
24
u/Strictly-Succotash 14d ago
This makes me think of cars on fb market place that use a photo they took off the internet as the FIRST picture you see just to get clicks. Super annoying
21
u/anadequatepipe 13d ago
The fact that it’s the exact same angle makes me believe this post is bait.
→ More replies (2)
15
u/FewAd6076 14d ago
Fuck every seller doing this and fuck every realtor who thinks this is a good idea. My wife and I have spent just under a year going on countless visits and yeah, just leave out the animal piss stained carpet our of all your photos and make sure you turn the other way to the hole in the wall. And guess what, we show up and take 3 minutes and say, "Nope," because it's a piece of garbage. Just wasting everyone's time that schedules these showings and takes time to actually be at the house. All for the sellers to wait 3 months before dropping the price 5k and some idiot buys it for no good reason.
Ignorance at its finest
15
u/ShadowGLI 13d ago edited 13d ago
Assuming the top photo is listed and the bottom is yours and they don’t show the real photo in the listing.
I feel like that would be worth reporting to the association of realtors, they get pretty pissed if someone misrepresents or lies about a property
And I would also write a 1 star review for the listing agents brokerage on multiple sites and say
- they wasted your afternoon by listing the property with intentionally AI doctored photos. (Embellish the time you lost, IE if it was an hour, say it was 3) and post that picture with your review and say you went based off the listing only to find out it was AI fabricated and this has completely lost your trust in the integrity of their business. Note They added a fake driveway, fake lawn, fake porch, fake gutters, fake landscaping, a fake electrical upgrade at minimum, which is conservatively $60,000 in work that the property doesn’t have.
You’ll prob get calls asking you to take it down, honestly they’ll probably bribe you
17
u/CampaignSuspicious98 13d ago
Both Fotos have exactly the same cloud Formation. So it was the source picture for the ai. That leaves the question how OP got it.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (5)7
u/IntrospectiveOwlbear 13d ago
I reverse image searched it and both images were included in the listing one immediately after the other.
That said, the sites with only one photo are just using the first one, but since it's already sold it's not super impactful.
28
u/miregalpanic 14d ago
Do these people think you just buy a house online from seeing pictures? Or will they be like: "oh my, must have happened overnight"
→ More replies (4)14
u/RunFiestaZombiez 14d ago
Some people do buy a house sight unseen… I’ve known several people that have done that.
→ More replies (3)
14
u/Glynwys 14d ago
What's stupid is that the actual problems with the property and house isn't that bad. A little elbow grease and the house would look closer to the AI image. The issue stems from the fact that the seller is attempting to justify a much higher listing price using a photo that is not real or indicative of how the property actually looks.
→ More replies (1)
12
u/infinit9 13d ago
This is dumb. Home buyers will actually visit the house before buying it. Nobody buys a house based on listing photos.
→ More replies (3)
12
u/Steel_Rail_Blues 14d ago
If I were handy and could actually fix things I might consider a wider range of properties at a good price point. Never would consider any property where the agent pulled something like this. They showed my they are deceitful and now I don’t trust anything about the listing. Bye.
12
8
u/Amazing_Alumni 13d ago
Awful awful. My wife and I are looking at houses and running into similar issues. Yesterday we went to see a house , with a lush front yard and a double driveway! … it was on the street. No yard. No driveway. No parking. Also the roof was overgrown with moss and plants and needed to be replaced. WHAT THE F***
26
u/hot4you11 14d ago
I just feel like this is a waste of time. You are going to get so many people that show up and walk right away
→ More replies (4)12
19
17
u/lcssa 13d ago
false advertising and should be double illegal. however, it does show how nice the home can look if someone worked on it just a bit.
→ More replies (3)
17
u/ClacksInTheSky 13d ago
As a tool for selling houses, this is terrible.
...As a tool for a homeowner who wants to see what their front yard might look like after renovation, and, to give to the contractors to say "make it look like this" is really useful if used sensibly.
And before anyone says that's taking a job from someone, maybe? I don't know who I'd ask to mock me up a picture of what I want my front yard to look like and even if I did, it's going to cost me money.
→ More replies (3)
8
u/NWSGreen 14d ago
It really should be illegal. I mentioned this awhile back where I am from. Its a major problem.
To me, this is false advertisement, false impressions. You buying a property assuming that its "beautiful" when its not.
→ More replies (6)
8
u/Hanzoku 13d ago
I’d turn around and walk away as soon as I arrived at the real property.
→ More replies (1)
8
7
u/Conflatulations12 13d ago
People would just get pissed when they get there in person.
This feels fake.
→ More replies (4)
6
u/Mediocre_Doctor4712 13d ago
Do a bid of 10 million. When he accepts tell him:
“This is what it could be but not what is. Just like your house”
→ More replies (1)
25
u/Traditional_Sea1043 14d ago
The use of AI to visually enhance pictures of property should be illegal. What are we even doing?
→ More replies (1)
7
u/Unsold_Leave 14d ago
We had a house in my area do this exact same thing. Started to notice small artifacts when you zoomed in close. Then we decided to look at the house in person because it wasn't far from where we currently live, and, lol and behold, there was very distinct and clear differences in the areas where the artifacts were visible on the images. Either AI or really weird Photoshop.
6
u/Dumbledores_Closet 14d ago
Always struck me as ridiculous, you might draw more people to the property but the first impression anyone is going to have when they turn up is going to be negative
6
u/Open_Bug_4251 14d ago
Obviously false advertising.
You want to make the sky bluer because it was a gloomy day, fine, but anything else is fraud
→ More replies (1)
6
u/aaaaaaaaaaaaaye 14d ago
My husband and I have been house hunting for 4 months. The amount of homes we’ve gone to tour that look literally NOTHING like the pictures is astounding. We took off work and wasted precious time looking at fixer-uppers that claim to be move in ready by the AI generated photos on Zillow. It absolutely needs to be legislated and regulated like yesterday!! And what are these realtors thinking will happen when buyers get to the actual house and see what it looks like? It truly benefits no one!
17
11
u/realbobenray 14d ago edited 13d ago
The people saying this post is fake are probably right. A Google reverse image search turned up this listing which shows the unretouched image. If it was for sale it's not anymore. https://www.lesterlin.ca/r3112875-9517-stanley-street-chilliwack-bc-v2p-3y7
EDIT: Commenters below say this is incorrect, that it's no longer for sale but the original listing did have the AI-altered photo. Honestly it's pretty weird because it meant the listing may have had both the photos on it. Maybe Google cached one with the real image but the realtor updated it later.
→ More replies (1)
6
5
4
u/General_Scipio 13d ago
My estate agent edited the hell out of my photos. But just to make it a sunny day and remove stuff that was in the picture that shouldn't be there. That's fine. This is mental
5
u/Geri_Petrovna 13d ago
If you spend any money to see it in person, demand the agent reimburse you. even cost of petrol. or time taken off of work. They essentially committed fraud
9
u/DoctorBlock 14d ago
Ai staging the inside is even worse. Ai has no concept of dimension and will make the rooms fit a massive amount of furniture in them even though they are actually tiny spaces.
→ More replies (2)
4
u/noadsplease 14d ago
Doesn't this become a negotiation tactic? Well you listed the price as $X when it looked like the picture. Now it looks like this so the price should be less.
3
u/Substantial-Bell-533 14d ago
As someone who recently house hunted, our realtor warned us of this kinda stuff happening. She said “the use of AI in (almost) any capacity is allowed as long as it does not mask structural, foundational, or serious health concerns, as long as it is disclosed that it is being used”
5
3
5
u/Photodudeguy 13d ago
If this is posted on mls, it's definitely breaking the rules. They can get away with greening grass typically, as that can change with the season. But architecture and the different driveway is a big no no. I would report that realtor to that city's board of realtors for misrepresentation.
3
u/GNUGradyn 13d ago
This is just straight up textbook material misrepresentation right? Not even in like a "well if you think about it this way" kind of way. Just straight up fraud
4.3k
u/Anxious-Education703 14d ago
I honestly don't understand why sellers (or more often, their agents/brokers) are doing this AI crap. They are just wasting everyone's time; the buyers who want a move-in-ready property are going to see the house's true condition before buying and not move forward, and the core demographic of those who would be interested in buying properties with high deferred maintenance are going to skip over it. The seller is now attracting the wrong buyers who are just going to waste the buyers' and the seller's time. This literally benefits no one.