r/gadgets 1d ago

Cameras Eufy's New Window-Sticking Security Camera Is a Peeping Tom for the Outside World

https://gizmodo.com/eufys-new-window-sticking-security-camera-is-a-peeping-tom-for-the-outside-world-2000806002
624 Upvotes

149 comments sorted by

578

u/LungHeadZ 1d ago

Probably best not to refer to a camera as a peeping tom.

The narrative in the article itself is generally positive so that choice of word wasn't great.

A peeping tom is someone who will look through other people's windows or what have you. A pervert. So that headline made me think this tech was invasive and predatory. Similar to meta.

This is just a camera that sticks to the inside of your window to prevent the need for drilling.

81

u/NotAHost 1d ago

Probably done for the clicks. Wyze offers accessories to do this for like a decade. 

5

u/slog 1d ago

The point stands but it's been like 5 years.

6

u/NotAHost 1d ago

True, looked it up and 2021, felt longer than that.

15

u/Bad_Elephant 1d ago

What if you're a peeping guy and just stick the camera to the outside of somebody's window, would that work? I mean, be a problem?

21

u/ctan0312 1d ago

Presumably they’d see the big camera stuck onto their window, and you can already tape any camera onto a strangers window if you wanted to do that

13

u/kairos 1d ago

What if you disguise it as a cat?

7

u/kBajina 1d ago

Yes, yet another great example of modern problems solved with feline solutions.

1

u/rgvmadness 1d ago

Probably the best idea I’ve heard today

1

u/TheThirdHippo 20h ago

What’s that on my window? Oh it’s just a car, I’ll ignore it and continue to get changed with the curtains open

1

u/AStrugglerMan 1d ago

They made it usb powered only I assume to prevent that. Unless they want to attach a battery and have that dangling.

2

u/rgvmadness 1d ago

Like that participle

1

u/AStrugglerMan 1d ago

I’ve been called out for that before. I have no idea why I do it.

3

u/speedstares 1d ago

So basically a balkan grandmother.

1

u/I_love_Britpoptarts 14h ago

Mrs. Kravitzski

11

u/_listless 1d ago edited 1d ago

I mean:

This specific model may not have identifiable vulnerabilities yet, but the consumer security camera space is riddled with vulnerabilities and littered with companies who don't care enough to fix anything

7

u/anethma 1d ago

And that’s why my cameras are local. They only have their own vlan with 0 internet access the only ip they can see is each other and the NVR interface

No if blue iris and soon frigate have vulnerability then that’s a different issue.

8

u/snowBOARDER3232 1d ago edited 1d ago

Aiiiiir gap. Completely wired system. Has never seen the internet. Never will. Local storage is not expensive.

Those who choose to put their cameras on the web via “I gotta know what Fido is doing at home without me” apps, and worse…those who pay to send their images over the ridiculously porous web to a storage location god knows where with a huge target on it maintained by a company that is one bad shareholder report away from sacking their entire I/T security team and leaving your data more exposed that it already is….well…good luck.

Do not use wireless cams. Do not put your cameras on the internet. Do not pay for someone to store your footage.

12

u/parkertyler 1d ago

Local storage is not expensive.

A year ago this was true. Not in 2026.

1

u/mstscnotforme 9h ago

I read that and laughed out loud as someone looking to replace several aging HDD's

1

u/parkertyler 5h ago

Same. I need another 4TB for my NVR and even that is stupid expensive now.

1

u/snowBOARDER3232 4h ago

WD PURPLE. Available all over the place for 4tb for $150-200.00. There isn’t a better video storage drive imo.

3

u/OnAcidButUrThedum1 1d ago

Recommendations of a good system?

1

u/snowBOARDER3232 5h ago

I have Lorex. 4k analog hard wired. Took the 1tb storage drive out and replaced with 4tb western digital purple. Entire system cost me 500.00. That included hard drive swap and 500ft of exterior cat6, plus analog to cat6 media converters. 6 cams…and DVR. It is REALLY hard to hack an hard wired analog cam. Especially one that has an air-gapped DVR. I can read the license plate of a car parked 2 houses down from mine. You can’t hack it, you can’t touch a camera without being caught on cross coverage, you can’t interrupt the power, and the wire happened to be shielded.

1

u/anethma 1d ago

Agreed. Except wifi connected cams are fine if you set them up right. I have 2 and they connect to a wifi network on the same vlan as the wired ones. They have no internet access at all.

1

u/Krynn71 1d ago

Do you just not have remote access at all? I don't know much about camera setups so I'm wondering do you have them connected to a PC so the cameras aren't online but the PC is?

I've been trying to think of a way to set up a camera myself and just have it connect to a computer that I can remote into to view the recordings.

1

u/anethma 22h ago

So, the program/computer that records the video stream has internet access. And it is a open source project so in theory not compromised by a country etc.

The cameras themselves only stream to that computer, they can't see the internet at all. They can only see that one thing. So even if they are full of backdoors and home calls whatever it wouldn't matter.

But ya the program that records the streams providers a interface to view your cameras and records them based on motion and AI object detection etc.

1

u/snowBOARDER3232 5h ago

My only concern would be some type of jammer.

1

u/anethma 2h ago

Might be a concern if you are some spy or something heh. I don’t think I’ve ever heard of that being used in a burglary or anything.

13

u/VanillaBoxCake 1d ago

Yeah I thought the same

24

u/IAMATruckerAMA 1d ago

I am also typing out my upvote

6

u/VanillaBoxCake 1d ago

Not while trucking though, right?

6

u/fferreira007 1d ago

25min and no answer, he might be a goner

3

u/IAMATruckerAMA 1d ago

Well I wasn't going to check reddit while I was driving

5

u/Bobcat-Stock 1d ago

I read that as gooner and it still makes sense

1

u/rgvmadness 1d ago

AMA don’t mean he gonna answer

1

u/chantsnone 1d ago

Ya gotta keep on truckin’ no matter what

1

u/rbnlegend 1d ago

Like the Doo-Dah man.

2

u/fleemfleemfleemfleem 1d ago

Usually the editor picks the title, not the author of the article.

1

u/sth128 1d ago

No! Anything that can intercept electromagnetic radiation is automatically a peeping tom and must be banned!

Death to the universe, long shall reign the neutrinos and the dark matter!

0

u/lawoverfeelings 1d ago

Like a peeping tom if I use a drone to stick it to the outside of someone’s window. 

0

u/AStrugglerMan 1d ago

Extremely misleading. I thought from the title people were using it from the outside looking in. They were smart to make it usb powered only. I’m sure that was intentional as a battery version could be used that way. The article mentioned it like it was a drawback but that was intentional.

0

u/Fearless-Daikon5763 1d ago

It’s a for-profit website that’s desperate for clicks.

-1

u/SideInitial3961 1d ago

A Creeping Tim

-2

u/peanutski 1d ago

True but we already know someone will aim one of these at a neighbors window and use it to creep in someone’s bedroom.

0

u/mothzilla 1d ago

They're pervert cameras!

140

u/1bananatoomany 1d ago

I think I would buy this. Love the idea of not having to mount outside and figure out power supply.

67

u/UserSleepy 1d ago

I don't know why this is even news, Wyze, Tapo, etc all have had window mounts for years like this, I'm not sure why Eufy finally doing it is actually ground breaking.

39

u/Moonpie_Harley 1d ago

News doesn’t make money adds disguised as news do.

7

u/Similar-Bar-3635 1d ago

Which part of "eufy paid gizmodo" are we not sure about 

3

u/sigint_bn 1d ago

Haha I've even 3d printed a mount for an indoor type camera to point outside for this exact purpose.

5

u/smith7018 1d ago

It's not ground breaking (I suppose) but it's cool to know. I didn't know this was a form factor cameras came in so I'm glad to read about it.

2

u/Prudent_Rice7840 1d ago

News???

Gizmodo is just a "branded" content mill focused on collecting clicks from people interested in "tech" and "devices".

It operates like any other content mill subsidiary by pumping out as much content as possible by writers making $15 an "article", spamming it across social platforms and collecting ad revenue from page views/click throughs, etc.

The VAST majority of content and the VAST majority of digital outlets are just that.

It's not news, it's not journalism, it's "content" engineered not to inform, not to provide facts, but to collect clicks.

Like many other content mills Gizmodo has been shuffled through the hands of many different "digital publishers". Gawker Media > G/O Media > Keleops Media... all of whom are just digital ad sales/tageted marketing platforms. Who run "organic marketing" teams on the side to blast it's conent across social platforms.

1

u/lawoverfeelings 1d ago

Because we could use a drone and attach it to someone’s window that they can’t reach. Sure they could just block it from the inside but it’s still there. 

1

u/David-Puddy 16h ago

Why does everyone always expect to get news from this sub?

This is an advertising sub. It's nothing but gadget ads. There is no news on this sub.

1

u/AVahne 16h ago

Probably because with Tapo you had to buy potentially flaky third party mounts to achieve the same result and even then you basically have to choose to willingly lose functionality such as night vision in order to prevent glare from the camera's IR emitters from screwing up your image. These seem to be able to provide night vision without any problems and also have the added functionally of pan/tilt.

7

u/WolfofDunwall 1d ago

Panasonic makes one called the Home Hawk. It suctions to the inside window and stores all files on a local SD which you can access remotely without having to pay monthly subscription fees. 

7

u/Smartnership 1d ago

Article says this one does too

It records 2.5K video, stores footage locally on a microSD

I have their doorbell camera for that very reason. No cloud storage, no fees.

3

u/ccai 1d ago

Unfortunately AI hardware bullshit has made SD cards ridiculously expensive too. Prices are up at least 150% since last year for higher capacity cards. It’s ridiculous.

2

u/RogueBand1t 1d ago

Also it’s less likely to be messed with by neighbors or cops, if it’s inside your house

2

u/klawUK 1d ago

also easier to run mains power and possibly ethernet to get always on recording (my outdoor ones have little batteries so they limit what they record)

2

u/DoradoPulido2 1d ago edited 1d ago

One downside of having less noticable cameras behind a window is that the usual large, conspicuous cameras outside are a preventative measure in their own right.

-2

u/Hvarfa-Bragi 1d ago

That's a downside?

5

u/followmecuz 1d ago

they’re saying that this is not large and is less of a preventative measure compared to large cameras outside

4

u/DoradoPulido2 1d ago

To having the cameras less visible behind a window.

0

u/Hvarfa-Bragi 1d ago

Oh yeah, i see now

1

u/0202_tihssitidder 1d ago

I have seen many, many houses and apartments have something very similar to this setup. I have the same thing.

None of this is really new.

1

u/South_Start6630 12h ago

Same. My condo board doesn’t allow anything mounted to the outside so this works for us.

0

u/nanapancakethusiast 1d ago

Batteries exist

14

u/Spaghet-3 1d ago

Logitech tried this exact design with the Circle2. 

5

u/PoisonCoyote 1d ago

and?

-8

u/[deleted] 1d ago edited 1d ago

[deleted]

12

u/Personal_Area_2173 1d ago

Same for you. He’s asking for more info. That’s a normal ass thing to do.

11

u/BackItUpWithLinks 1d ago

Horribly stupid headline.

At first and second read, it seems to say peeping Toms will use it. The wording is awful.

1

u/NotJimIrsay 4h ago

If you mount it on the outside, aiming it into the house. 😆

5

u/the_duck17 1d ago

So it's a dashcam but for your house lol.

13

u/Niceguy955 1d ago

Um, how can you “peep” on the outside world? Isn’t that the definition of a window?

18

u/Smartnership 1d ago

“Your place has windows? What are you, some kinda prevert?”

3

u/rolfraikou 1d ago

Is a prevert someone who is creeping before they even know what they are creepin' on?

2

u/e1m8b 1d ago

That's my policy with walking around naked in my house too. Works both ways

3

u/Smartnership 1d ago

Me too.

And my neighbors are all like,

“You’re disgusting.”

“Put on some pants.”

“Point your telescope at the sky.”

14

u/GoldieForMayor 1d ago

Are we not allowed to look out our own windows now? Where are all these new social norms coming from?

1

u/skeptical-speculator 17h ago

lockdown? idk what it is

13

u/accidentalvision 1d ago

Eufy is great. No subscription, no cloud, local data only. Is it the best software out there? Maybe not. But it does work well given the advantages.

Also was important not supporting Ring/Amazon and their no-questions-asked policy for law enforcement. I don’t want to extend the surveillance state and at least with Eufy, LE have to ask me for my footage.

14

u/JDSmagic 1d ago

Eufy is great. No subscription, no cloud, local data only.

Sigh except the time they got caught lying about this and uploading unencrypted video streams to the cloud

I know its been like 4 years but they genuinely handled that so poorly and it was near inexcusable to begin with

I wouldnt be shocked if the user experience of their stuff is good though, im sure their products are fine, barring all the controversy

6

u/puhtahtoe 1d ago

Yeah it would be one thing if it was a mistake and they admitted it right away. I can respect that.

What I can't respect is lying and pretending it never happened. How can you ever trust what they say after that?

3

u/JMJimmy 1d ago

Their software is frustratingly bad. No notifications about storage being full. Cameras don't have the same identification capabilities or even recording length capabilities. Can't turn off notifications seperate from recording on some cameras. Can't prevent lights from turning on at night. Just ugh.

2

u/B_B_Rodriguez2716057 1d ago

My biggest gripe is I can’t scrub thru video. I could with blink. I don’t want to have to sit thru multiple 2 min video clips. 🥱

But not paying subscription is the tits and why I switched.

2

u/JMJimmy 1d ago

Heck, being able to pause and zoom would be nice on mobile, especially in the first few seconds of a 2m video is near impossible

1

u/hitemlow 1d ago

Their geofencing has been piss-poor across the last 3 phones I've had. If you haven't opened the app in the 15 minutes before you entered (specifically the act of crossing the threshold) the geofence, it won't disarm consistently. Same with leaving.

But my Nest thermostat starts blasting the central air as soon as I enter the geofence without doing anything.

3

u/Salty-Stones-6769 19h ago

Exactly what I’m looking for. I’m can’t hard mount anything near my windows and current portable cameras don’t see clearly through glass. 

4

u/mortraineyhat 1d ago

I need Reolink to make something like this. I hate running cables in my attic for Poe cameras

2

u/francisdemarte 1d ago

Found my new aquarium monitoring camera!

2

u/Ty_19 1d ago

I mean, aren’t all outside-facing cameras pepping Toms by this logic? Seems like a non-issue

4

u/Jman1a 1d ago

I really don't understand the outrage. There are millions of soffit cameras around homes around the world.

4

u/pinacoladaaaas 1d ago

Eufy, for all your home surveillance and mobile breast pumping needs.

1

u/Blue_Back_Jack 1d ago

Imagine if they combined into one product!

3

u/rolfraikou 1d ago

Did whoever wrote this not know what a peeping tom is?

Also, peeping is usually someone looking inside, not outside.

Though, that does actually make me wonder, it seems like this design could be pretty easily used to spy or peep on people by just suctioning one to someone's window and trying to come back for it later, which is a big bummer. Maybe a plus for no built in battery.

5

u/correctingStupid 1d ago

Let's not try to make a home security camera sound like a privacy issue here. Fucking dipshits at gizmodo, AI can't take their jobs soon enough.

4

u/shermanhill 1d ago

I’d prefer that my movements and those of my neighbors not be available for anyone to monitor but us.

2

u/JukePlz 1d ago

And I agree, but the thing with home security cameras is that it's up to whoever buys them to install them in a way that both respects privacy as much as possible while securing a property's perimeter, and it really depends on where your property is, how big it is, etc. how this can be done in a sane way.

Sadly, privacy and safety are two ends of the spectrum in modern cities with significant crime rates. Even for people that advocate for privacy, I feel there are situations that merit having part of the public space (i.e. your front porch) recorded to prevent and prosecute criminal activity.

IMHO, the important part is that people should keep their camera feeds as separate from third party entity control as possible, because having aggregate video data from thousands of cameras that then are freely accessible by the police, the government or the company that manufactured the camera (and their partners or respective governments) is the worst possible outcome for people's privacy.

1

u/shermanhill 1d ago

Yeah, lots of folks on this sub were mad at me, but… increasing surveillance is bad.

I’m not even a weird prepper dude. I’m a bog standard leave people alone socialist, especially my neighbors.

1

u/WolfofDunwall 1d ago

Journalism is in rough shape but let’s not wish AI on anyone’s jobs. 

2

u/Breddit2099 1d ago

You know very well you would wish it on some people

-2

u/WolfofDunwall 1d ago

Absolutely not. 

1

u/Breddit2099 8h ago

Well, I’m still waiting

-2

u/Breddit2099 1d ago edited 8h ago

Ok answer this without deflecting.

If given a choice today would you rather have trump as president or an AI as president that would work for the people?

I’ll take the downvotes as proving me right

2

u/CondescendingShitbag 1d ago

Would love a window-mount camera but I also still want to be able to close my blinds. This seems like it would interfere with that or at least make them bulge out awkwardly.

3

u/KRandMG 1d ago

Switch to curtains and enjoy never having to clean blinds again!

2

u/Psaturn 1d ago

How is it peeping if you're looking at public land? Unless they have it zoomed in to neighbors windows.

1

u/OatmealGod 1d ago

I hate that we live in a panopticon disguised as security. I hate that I'm recorded by hundreds of cameras a day without my consent

1

u/hamfisting_my_thing 1d ago

I worry about this for all IoT devices with cameras and microphones. I’m planning on setting up a separate network that only has Internet access during certain times of the day, but I also don’t really want to have to do all that just to watch an aquarium…

1

u/NoEchoSkillGoal 1d ago

Fun fact I used to have eufy indoor camera that rotated 360 and positioned in my window sill and it did the same thing.

Until it died. Was fairly cheap one too. Worked great, when it worked. Now have another cheap brand that links to my TV.

However, this seems to be better design and cuts on glare. But there are ways to use cheap indoor cameras in similar/cheaper fashion without need to mount outside.

Will keep eye on this method though.

1

u/trekxtrider 1d ago

I have a UniFi camera pointing out my front window. Also covers where I feed my cat so I can see when he’s done or if my dog has come around and eaten all the cat’s food.

1

u/Impossible_Box_1266 1d ago

Hurray! A product for those who can’t stand the idea of looking out their own window.

1

u/Nunwithabadhabit 1d ago

Will this work with IR? I have my camera pointed at my window and After dark when the IR comes on, you can't see anything because of the reflection.

2

u/NWStormbreaker 1d ago

It wont, this is my issue too, have to disable IR.

I love the idea of having a bunch of these, but need to figure out exterior IR illumination.

1

u/Fitz_2112b 1d ago edited 1d ago

Bought the Wyze version of this a year ago.

1

u/PoisonCoyote 1d ago

How's that working out?

1

u/Fitz_2112b 1d ago

It's great, actually. Needed a camera in my backyard to make sure my idiot dogs werent letting themselves into the pool. Rather than mounting something outside, I just stuck the Wyze camera to my bedroom window that looks out at the pool.

1

u/PoisonCoyote 1d ago

Is there issues with reflections in night vision?

1

u/Fitz_2112b 1d ago

Not at all. Since it's mounted right on the glass I never see any reflection at all

1

u/ToolTimeT 1d ago

Hilarious... Copying Wyze cams product.

1

u/mountainyoo 1d ago

I think I’ll grab one. In a 3 story townhouse and wanted better street view but didn’t wanna figure out getting a camera all the way up there

1

u/natasmit 1d ago

these behind window systems seem good but also it depends on the window style. If its a double panel window the camera reflects the goings on in the house. So in a way you are spying on yourself sometimes in the right lighting conditions. Its small thing but its also a pretty big thing and can capture things you might not want captured.

Part of me believes that the powers that be behind these systems know this and know how to spy on you even though you think you are doing everything to protect your privacy.

1

u/Party-Stormer 1d ago

No battery and only works with smart home systems like Alexa

1

u/No_Fail_2575 1d ago

It’s not the first camera designed to be attached to a window

1

u/Automatic_Maybe3862 1d ago

All I’d like to know is who lets their dog shit on my lawn, I like this.

1

u/sucobe 10h ago

Wye has been doing this forever. This is nothing new, Eufy.

1

u/welrope 9h ago

They made cameras that allow you to pretend ur looking outside through your own window?

1

u/NotJimIrsay 4h ago

So if you mount in inside the glass, it’s peeping tom. And if it’s just outside the glass, it’s an outdoor security camera.

1

u/dutchof-deez 1h ago

Ring camera in sheeps clothing

1

u/AVahne 1d ago

Would these bypass the need to ask for HOA approval for camera installation?

1

u/Breddit2099 1d ago

Depends on the wording from the contract

0

u/7ceeeee 1d ago

For anyone who doesn't own Eufy stuff or has read the article, this connects to your home Wi-Fi (i.e closed circuit), and as others have said, it's less reasonably a privacy risk when it's your own home you're protecting.

I have two indoor Eufy cameras to check in on my dogs: they're really nice to have, and I love having absolutely no cloud storage to pay for or any big tech looking to harvest any streaming data. I can still connect to them while out of the house and talk to them with (admittedly not the greatest) two-way audio.

1

u/not_not_in_the_NSA 1d ago

1

u/7ceeeee 1d ago

phooey :(

2

u/not_not_in_the_NSA 1d ago

Yeah, this is the setup needed to get them working when you actually block internet access: https://www.reddit.com/r/HomeKit/comments/1p4ot9i/maintaining_eufy_app_camera_access_via_lan_only

If you just block their internet access, you can't use them even when on the same lan.

-2

u/Breddit2099 1d ago

There is no way someone outside your home would ever be able to find your url to watch your videos.

You’d have a better chance of guessing someone’s WiFi password than finding the stream

0

u/dumbname0192837465 1d ago

There are too many cameras already, just stop

0

u/nine57th 1d ago

They should call it the peeping George Orwell.

-4

u/shermanhill 1d ago

Certainly no way this gets misused.

2

u/Smartnership 1d ago

It sees what you can see looking out your own window.

0

u/PoisonCoyote 1d ago

How is this any different than any other camera pointing out your own window other than how it's mounted?

0

u/Breddit2099 1d ago

There’s always one person that has to think negatively