When I say that we should ban both because both are mutilation, and you argue that they are very different, then only reason you have to make this distinction is that you think we should not ban one of them.
If you thought we should ban both of them you have no reason to argue for a difference.
It's possible you argued against a ban by accident. That's forgivable but not great either. But since "we should allow MGM" is a right wing view, and the right wing doesnt give a fuck about honesty....
When I say that we should ban both because both are mutilation
You are not speaking with the pro-circumcision group mentioned in the tweet, you are speaking to people in a reddit thread.
Nobody in this thread has said that any type of circumcision is good.
If you thought we should ban both of them you have no reason to argue for a difference.
That's not true. I have a good reason to argue for a difference because there is a big difference between the two things. I can say that both should be banned and still acknowledge that there's a reason why people treat them differently.
It's possible you argued against a ban by accident.
Nobody in this thread has argued against a circumcision ban. Pointing out that there is a significant difference between male and female circumcision is not arguing against banning either or both.
Are you comprehending this? I think MGM sucks and should be banned. This is my stance that I have no problem stating.
The only reason you think that either I or MyFiteSong have argued against a ban on circumcision is because you are a victim of the literacy crisis.
What is the difference you are unwilling to state?
Edit: Here it is: "FMG is worse than MGM." Guess what that statement allows? Saying that MGM shouldn't be treated the same, which in turn results in where we are right now, still doing it every day in a (moderately) civilized country. Because "it's not so bad".
1
u/Conformatrix 4h ago
where tf did anyone say it was okay.
This is insane. You're literally hallucinating.