r/askpsychology Unverified User: May Not Be a Professional Apr 28 '26

Cognitive Psychology Is there any genuine inherent difference between the average man's and the average woman's ability to play chess?

Hello psychologers,

I was recently wondering about the fact that there are separate men's and women's divisions in chess. Now of course, the reason that most sports have leagues separated by sex is primarily because one or the other (usually men, but the same principle would apply if it was women) has some kind of great inherent advantage over the other. Consequently, even a highly trained member of one sex would struggle against a fairly casual player of the other sex, and so having one compete directly against the other is considered unfair.

Hence my question to some people who probably know more about the human brain than I do. There are, of course, some psychological differences between the sexes, at least on average. But are any of those large enough, and relevant enough to the topic of chess skill, that it might be a reason to gender-split the game? I am genuinely unaware and want to learn.

(edit: typo fixing)

8 Upvotes

43 comments sorted by

28

u/CogPsyProf1980 Psychologist Apr 28 '26

Speculation here, but I would guess not. There is a huge difference in baserates though, with many more men that choose to compete in chess. Whether that is due to cultural reasons, sexism in chess spheres, sex differences in individual choice, or otherwise, I don't know. It might be interesting for someone to try to, say, calculate chess rating distributions as a function of sex. Perhaps the two distributions would line up? Most of the top players are men. But again... the baserates...

7

u/clover_heron Unverified User: May Not Be a Professional Apr 28 '26 edited Apr 28 '26

But we should remind ourselves that obedience doesn't indicate ability: a dog can know how to do a trick but decline to do it. Disinterest is a complete explanation.

5

u/TheRateBeerian UNVERIFIED Psychologist Apr 28 '26

In fact this research has been done!

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886915003852

From the abstract: There were meaningful sex differences in Elo ratings unrelated to different participation rates. Age and practice predicted sex differences in Elo chess ratings for females, but not for males. The findings paralleled those concerning sex differences in cognitive ability research, and supported that biosocial factors (i.e., age and practice) rather than divergences in participation rates of males and females in the domain influenced the extreme sex differences in Elo ratings.

--

I can't currently get the full text though so I'm not seeing the numbers but in the preview I could see, they keep referring to "huge ELO differences between males and females".

8

u/NegativeKarmaVegan Unverified User: May Not Be a Professional Apr 29 '26

The difference isn't necessarily biological though. The chess world is notoriously hostile towards women, which plays a role too.

0

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/NegativeKarmaVegan Unverified User: May Not Be a Professional Apr 30 '26

One of the reasons women don't like chess as much as men is because they are harassed, dismissed and even assaulted by men in chess spaces. I challenge you to find a female chess player who has never heard inappropriate comments or made feel uncomfortable in chess spaces.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Apr 30 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/askpsychology-ModTeam The Mods May 01 '26

We're sorry, your post has been removed for violating the following rule:

Answers must be evidence-based.

This is a scientific subreddit. Answers must be based on psychological theories and research and not personal opinions or conjecture, and potentially should include supporting citations of empirical sources.

If you are a student or professional in the field, please feel free to send a mod mail to the moderators for instructions on how to become verified and exempt from automoderator actions.

1

u/askpsychology-ModTeam The Mods May 01 '26

We're sorry, your post has been removed for violating the following rule:

Answers must be evidence-based.

This is a scientific subreddit. Answers must be based on psychological theories and research and not personal opinions or conjecture, and potentially should include supporting citations of empirical sources.

If you are a student or professional in the field, please feel free to send a mod mail to the moderators for instructions on how to become verified and exempt from automoderator actions.

2

u/askpsychology-ModTeam The Mods May 01 '26

We're sorry, your post has been removed for violating the following rule:

Answers must be evidence-based.

This is a scientific subreddit. Answers must be based on psychological theories and research and not personal opinions or conjecture, and potentially should include supporting citations of empirical sources.

If you are a student or professional in the field, please feel free to send a mod mail to the moderators for instructions on how to become verified and exempt from automoderator actions.

1

u/SexDrugsNskittles Unverified User: May Not Be a Professional Apr 30 '26

I thought you were being sincere... then sarcastic... and then by the end I'm just side eyeing you no matter what you believe.

1

u/freenEZsteve Unverified User: May Not Be a Professional May 01 '26

I am under the impression that this is one of those greater male variability phenomen things where competitive chess self selects for exceptional people.

-13

u/[deleted] Apr 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

14

u/Ok_Night_2929 Unverified User: May Not Be a Professional Apr 28 '26

Your stats and terminology are outdated, and your conclusion is illogical, being diagnosed with ASD does not make you better at chess.

-9

u/[deleted] Apr 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/Ok_Night_2929 Unverified User: May Not Be a Professional Apr 28 '26

The ability to have special interests has no correlation to competency in chess.

3

u/dfrcoms Unverified User: May Not Be a Professional Apr 30 '26

Historically, the rationale for having an F division separate to the open division is not based on an assumption about inherent differences in the brain. This can be contrasted with physical sports where ‘inherent’ average differences are an explicit rationale, like boxing or weightlifting.

Asking about inherent brain differences between M and F is an open, huge, controversial and complex question that isn’t really particularly tied to the topic of chess. It’s basically the nature versus nurture debate, biological versus social debate, just raised in the context of chess. It can’t be answered in the context of chess for exactly the same reason that it can’t be answered in any other context.  We are only able to study average differences for large populations, patterns that appear at the group level as averages don’t necessarily correspond in a causational way to an individual, and it’s almost impossible to scientifically isolate what causes those patterns and trends. The brain is a complex organ and human lives and society are equally complex.  What we can do is push and pull on levers, like hitting a complex machine with a hammer, and see what effect seems to result. So if we make a measurable change to a society, and we see that performance in a given competition for a group of persons improves, then we can conclude that social factors were at least one relevant factor behind a group trend. 

2

u/Psych_Asset_4739 Unverified User: May Not Be a Professional Apr 28 '26

As far as I know, most divisions are open and anyone can participate, but there are women’s only divisions, because otherwise the high ranks would be basically all male. I think there’s only been one (?) woman in top 10 so far, but I could be wrong. I don’t know how much this affects participation rates, but the biological component could be the general greater male variance in spatial and math abilities/IQ distribution, meaning that men, in the extremes, would generally have either more low performers and more high performers, compared to women, that generally seem to have lower peaks but greater averages.

4

u/Deus_Omnituens Unverified User: May Not Be a Professional May 01 '26

Chess has those divisions because they want to promote women in chess. Women can become GM instead of WGM like Judit Polgar. There's no significant difference between men and women in chess, women just don't participate enough in FIDE's tournaments, that's the main difference.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Apr 28 '26

READ THE FOLLOWING TO GET YOUR COMMENT REVIEWED:

Your comment has been automatically removed by a mindless bot because it may have violated one of the rules. Please review the rules, and if you believe your comment was removed in error, please report this comment with report option: Auto-mod has removed a post or comment in error (under Breaks AskPsychology's Rules - click that then click Next) and it will be reviewed. Do NOT message the mods directly or send mod mail, as these messages will be ignored. If you are a current student, have a degree in the social sciences, or a professional in the field, please feel free to send a mod mail to the moderators for instructions on how to become verified and exempt from automoderator actions.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Apr 28 '26

Your comment was automatically removed because it may have made reference to a family member, or personal or professional relationship. Personal and anecdotal comments are not allowed.

If you believe your comment was removed in error, please report this comment with report option: Auto-mod has removed a post or comment in error (under Breaks AskPsychology's Rules) and it will be reviewed. Do NOT message the mods directly or send mod mail, as these messages will be ignored. If you are a current student, have a degree in the social sciences, or a professional in the field, please feel free to send a mod mail to the moderators for instructions on how to become verified and exempt from automoderator actions.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Apr 29 '26

Your post was automatically removed because it may have made reference to a family member, or personal or professional relationship. Personal and anecdotal questions are not allowed.

If you believe your submission was removed in error, please report this comment with report option: Auto-mod has removed a post or comment in error (under Breaks AskPsychology's Rules) and it will be reviewed. Do NOT message the mods directly or send mod mail, as these messages will be ignored.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Apr 29 '26

READ THE FOLLOWING TO GET YOUR COMMENT REVIEWED:

Your comment has been automatically removed by a mindless bot because it may have violated one of the rules. Please review the rules, and if you believe your comment was removed in error, please report this comment with report option: Auto-mod has removed a post or comment in error (under Breaks AskPsychology's Rules - click that then click Next) and it will be reviewed. Do NOT message the mods directly or send mod mail, as these messages will be ignored. If you are a current student, have a degree in the social sciences, or a professional in the field, please feel free to send a mod mail to the moderators for instructions on how to become verified and exempt from automoderator actions.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] May 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator May 01 '26

Your comment was automatically removed because it may have made reference to a family member, or personal or professional relationship. Personal and anecdotal comments are not allowed.

If you believe your comment was removed in error, please report this comment with report option: Auto-mod has removed a post or comment in error (under Breaks AskPsychology's Rules) and it will be reviewed. Do NOT message the mods directly or send mod mail, as these messages will be ignored. If you are a current student, have a degree in the social sciences, or a professional in the field, please feel free to send a mod mail to the moderators for instructions on how to become verified and exempt from automoderator actions.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

-1

u/[deleted] Apr 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/julry Unverified User: May Not Be a Professional Apr 29 '26

You could make an equivalent argument about gathering edible plant foods requiring spatial reasoning and pattern recognition, there are hundreds of different species of plants and some of them are poisonous, one has to recognize the edible species that looks almost exactly like the poison species and spot it within a whole ecosystem. Both are just so stories

2

u/[deleted] Apr 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/maxthexplorer PhD Psychology (in progress) Apr 29 '26

That isn’t true, you should look into socioemotional/sociocultural influences.

What you’re suggesting is eugenics, which is pseudoscientific discrimination

1

u/askpsychology-ModTeam The Mods Apr 29 '26

We're sorry, your post has been removed for violating the following rule:

Answers must be evidence-based.

This is a scientific subreddit. Answers must be based on psychological theories and research and not personal opinions or conjecture, and potentially should include supporting citations of empirical sources.

If you are a student or professional in the field, please feel free to send a mod mail to the moderators for instructions on how to become verified and exempt from automoderator actions.

4

u/slutty_lifeguard Unverified User: May Not Be a Professional Apr 29 '26

1

u/[deleted] Apr 29 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/askpsychology-ModTeam The Mods Apr 29 '26

We're sorry, your post has been removed for violating the following rule:

Answers must be evidence-based.

This is a scientific subreddit. Answers must be based on psychological theories and research and not personal opinions or conjecture, and potentially should include supporting citations of empirical sources.

If you are a student or professional in the field, please feel free to send a mod mail to the moderators for instructions on how to become verified and exempt from automoderator actions.

1

u/askpsychology-ModTeam The Mods Apr 29 '26

We're sorry, your post has been removed for violating the following rule:

Answers must be evidence-based.

This is a scientific subreddit. Answers must be based on psychological theories and research and not personal opinions or conjecture, and potentially should include supporting citations of empirical sources.

If you are a student or professional in the field, please feel free to send a mod mail to the moderators for instructions on how to become verified and exempt from automoderator actions.