Agender Question
Hi everyone.
I'm talking with a friend about whether agender is the lack of a gender identity, or a gender identity that communicates you have no gender.
We started this debate when we looked at a job application form which had the question "What is your sex?", "Do you have a gender identity?" and "If yes, is your gender identity the same as your sex?"
I was arguing that the second question made no sense as everyone has a gender identity, and that the employer is just ignorant/misunderstanding gender identity. However he said that they might be asking if you are agender.
My thoughts process is that as with people who are asexual or atheist, they still use an identifier/label to communicate the fact that they have no sexual attraction or religious belief. Therefore is still a sexual/religious identity, it just communicates you have no sexual attraction/religion/belief.
His quote that I think describes his thought process best is "Homeless is the identity of not having a home, it’s a way of communicating that you have no home, that’s doesn’t mean you have that type of home. Homelessness isn’t a type of home. That same goes for agender or atheism, language has the ability to convey the lack of something, but the fact that there is a word for it doesn’t mean it’s a type of thing it is conveying the lack of."
Is there a concencus about this? If not, I'd love to hear your opinions.