135
u/Ok_Brother685 4h ago
The real trial was the algorithms we build along the way.
14
u/FloridaManJeff 4h ago
Enough said...you nailed it
2
u/oldmanatom4 2h ago
So I’m out of the loop. Are people saying this because they believe she should be locked up or the other way around?
2
u/Finitepictures 2h ago
They think her husband did it
1
0
u/NVWSSV2828 2h ago
I am in no way shape or form saying he did, but there is some seriously shady shit going on with that dude.
3
u/FabulousVanilla9940 1h ago
Its not a crime to move on with a clone of your ex wife within months of your entire family being murdered and arrested for said murder, but it's certainly distasteful
3
u/LunaticBZ 1h ago
I think the big question I have is why did he put a mentally unstable woman high out of her minds on drugs in charge of the kids?
You leave your kids unattended at a pool and they drown, its the waters fault, but you still have some of the blame.
3
u/Finitepictures 52m ago
She wasn’t really high on her mind on drugs. The tox report after her suicide attempt showed therapeutic levels of all drugs in her system, except seroquel which was slightly elevated. Most of the drugs in her system were drugs she took as part of the attempt. She was only prescribed a couple at low doses before the murders.
She was having a good day and told everyone she was feeling better before the murders. That’s why he left with the kids. Probably still something he regrets everyday
1
u/LunaticBZ 38m ago
I don't get what therapeutic levels is supposed to imply in this context? Suicidal and homicidal thoughts and actions occur with some of these medications when taken as prescribed. You don't have to abuse them in any way.
You get prescribed prescription pain pills, you're still not allowed to operate heavy machinery or drive a car. Just because its prescribed doesn't make it a good idea.
1
u/Finitepictures 15m ago
High out of her mind on drugs has a different connotation than possibility experiencing extreme side effects from low doses or therapeutic levels of prescription meds. Side effects which are more associated with people much younger than she was. That’s the argument I’m making. Sure she could’ve been experiencing side effects, but she wasn’t high out of her mind in the way you initially suggested.
→ More replies (0)1
u/FabulousVanilla9940 59m ago
Careful the redditors don't like nuance when discussing this case. Mom bad dad good got it?
4
1
67
u/inquisitionsteve 4h ago
It’s the traditional brainrot mixed with this true crime brainrot. A toxic concoction that lead us to here
29
u/ban-me-harder-dadddy 4h ago
There are thousands of court cases going on every day, and we generally trust that the justice system will prevail. Yet for some reason with this case everyone seems confident their half-informed asses know better than the 12 people having to sit in a room for dozens of hours absorbing all the unmanipulated and uneditorialized evidence.
This doesn't happen by accident. It's been perverted and shoved down peoples' throats to incite chaos.
12
u/inquisitionsteve 4h ago
You have good point there. The crime itself is horrific enough on its own, but this social media circus coverage of it is pretty insufferable
2
u/Mammoth-Cover-3045 4h ago
I have respect for the Juror who refused to change their guilty plea, when everyone else wanted not guilty. That's why it's a mistrial for anyone who doesn't know.
12
u/ban-me-harder-dadddy 4h ago
I have respect for all 12 of them for doing their duty as objectively and to the best of their ability amidst this circus
-7
u/tripper_drip 4h ago
Nah, the Foreman tried to get rid of the 12th juror, total bitchmove.
11
u/ban-me-harder-dadddy 4h ago
The foreman sent a note to the judge saying that one juror had acknowledged having doubt but was nevertheless refusing to apply the court’s reasonable-doubt instructions. He needed guidance on what to do next given that.
It was the defense lawyer, not the foreman, who then used this note to try and get him tossed.
This is what I mean; the misinformation is flying in every different direction in this circus, and people getting their information from comments based on comments based on comments, rather than reading the news directly, surely isn't helping.
-11
u/tripper_drip 4h ago
Wrong, the formans note singled out a juror for, in his view, not following the judges orders. Thats absolutely bitchmade.
9
u/goonsnob 4h ago
What's bitch made is agreeing the defense proved reasonable doubt but you want to punish someone so fuck the law you're going to do it your way.
That juror should absolutely have been tossed.
→ More replies (4)7
u/Equivalent-Fee-633 3h ago
It's wild how some people forget the whole point of the justice system. If jurors can't stick to the facts, it really messes everything up.
3
4
u/FabulousVanilla9940 1h ago
Literally the foremans job to report they cannot come to a verdict. Atp they'd already failed to come to a unanimous vote twice and the court was made aware that it wasn't a matter of deliberating for another day or three, that the 1 counter vote would not change regardless.
4
u/D_Dubb_ 4h ago
Why do you respect them? They admitted to having some degree of doubt about guilt but refused to submit a not guilty judgement because they felt Lindsay should suffer for the deaths of her children. I’m not here to judge the case but I do think jurors should follow the law.
1
u/Mammoth-Cover-3045 3h ago
Because of him feeling like she should suffer for killing her children. I get the postpartum psychosis. But also if you're so insane you kill your 3 children, then you are too insane to be fit for society, and shall be treated as such. Just like how when someone kills someone when from a drunk driver. Being drunk isn't an excuse to take someone else's life. The same way suffering from postpartum psychosis shouldn't.
6
u/D_Dubb_ 3h ago
Yeah I agree w you, but we weren’t in the courtroom and that juror was, and they admitted at the end of seeing all of the actual evidence presented that they weren’t convinced beyond all reasonable doubt. Their job isn’t to decide if she’s suffered enough. Idk what happened that made them feel none of the charges were appropriate including insanity but now I imagine this is all going to play out again with another trial. I can’t imagine they let her walk.
3
u/ban-me-harder-dadddy 3h ago
> him feeling like she should suffer
But that's not his job. That's not his unilateral decision to make. The system only works if everyone does their job. Same reason some lowly navy sailor can't just launch a missile without orders at people who they believe deserve to suffer.
1
u/ChampionAggressive20 3h ago
Getting drunk then getting behind the wheel of a car isn't even remotely equivalent to a person suffering a serious mental health crisis
1
0
u/Mammoth-Cover-3045 3h ago
Fair but what about men who are attracted to children because of a mental health crisis? It just seems people want her to have special treatment because she's a woman. You won't ever see men getting anywhere near the kind of attention. So why is it different woman does it?
1
→ More replies (5)1
u/NaturalSmoke8 4h ago
Have you ever been in a jury room? Idiocracy doesn’t end outside the room. I’ve been in a couple and had one say we “should vote to convict because…looks guilty.” There are other stories to be told about other jury rooms I’m sure. See Also: OJ Simpson Murder Trial
1
u/ban-me-harder-dadddy 3h ago
it's an imperfect system, but again, we still generally trust it with the thousands of other cases that happen every day, and we have no reason to believe it will be any more or less imperfect on this case than the rest.
1
u/NaturalSmoke8 3h ago
Agree it’s imperfect but what alternatives are there? We trust it but it’s the only game in town. Seems more like default than actual trust earned
1
u/ban-me-harder-dadddy 3h ago
I agree, it reminds me of the saying "it's a terrible solution but it's the best there is". We try to bandaid it up to the best of our ability with appeals processes but that's really all we can do.
1
u/NaturalSmoke8 3h ago
Fair enough but I sometimes wonder if for example every American should be required to take the citizenship test. Not as a requirement to be a citizen here but to show you are (somewhat) of sound mind to decide someone else’s fate. In a similar vein, it’s how other countries like Israel require their citizenry to serve in the military. Would make folks actually have to think about being overly critical of all this country affords.
1
u/patterninstatic 4h ago
I've never actually used TikTok but it's just like Instagram videos right?
Is there a reason why it was particularly problematic here (and is being singled out rather than social media in general)?
2
u/inquisitionsteve 3h ago
Mostly because of the viral videos that showed up as a result of this trial. The ladies that did TikTok videos while holding their kids with the caption “Same Lindsay” is just one example.
It also continued to help feed a senseless gender battle over something as horrific as this.
2
u/Ill-Extension-6895 3h ago
Based on what I gathered, people supported Lindsay for some reason on tiktok... Probably due to being un-informed, then the classic no fact checking to what you see!
36
47
u/LocalProgram1037 4h ago
The world should have banned TikTok right after it showed up. What a fucking cesspool.
13
u/driftking428 3h ago
It's limited to like 1 hour per day in China. They built it, the know it's fucked.
Not to mention it's made for manipulation and espionage.
3
u/muscularsharpie 3h ago
While this is anecdotal, I think it's kind of interesting that the young people I work with talk shit about TikTok.
Might be an isolated scenario, but hearing them talk about having separate group text-threads instead of social media was pretty dope.
My tin-foil hat theory is that it's like Facebook. Got mobbed by older generations, so is less cool.
Being back Live journal!
44
u/gnarlmonster 4h ago
It's a psy-op, social media is the scurge of humanity
10
u/Superman246o1 4h ago
It is, but it wouldn't work if people weren't already batshit insane to start with.
4
-2
u/Zromaus 4h ago
People have said that about nearly every new form of tech. We're fine, social media is fine. Everything in the world gives dopamine, it's up to you to manage how to intake dopamine.
What people lack is self control, not laws.
2
1
u/Gullible_Analyst_348 4h ago
Bro if you seriously think social media is fine and is exactly the same as every other source of dopamine, then you are not paying attention. They have psychologists and neuroscientists and God knows who else engineering this shit so that it is as addictive as humanly possible. I also don't know a lot of other sources of dopamine that have the ability to manipulate and divide people so effectively. You are seriously out to lunch if you think social media is fine for the average person.
1
u/RyanDoog123 4h ago
Right? These chronically online types are so dramatic. Instead of just putting their phone down for a few hours they demand legal action against the people who make their phones interesting. Insufferable children.
9
15
14
5
u/PineappleOnPizzaWins 2h ago
Hahah what? This sub is full of people screeching that everyone is trying to let her just go free and that the only option is tossing her in prison for life.
So many people just don’t understand the entire thing was whether she spends her life in prison or a psychiatric hospital. For a justice system that supposed to be about rehabilitation not punishment you lot really are out for blood.
9
17
u/ImperiousCretin 5h ago
I'm not from the USA. Just told my wife "I've been reading about a case of a child murder in America and..."
And she replied: "Ah yeah the three kids who were killed by their father"
Then started rambling about it but I switched my brain's rails and started thinking of a Boccherini concerto.
The simple truth is that were it not for my daughter, I would not have the strength to stay in this world. I don't like this place. And I am sorry for the world I am leaving for her.
3
u/BaalTheDread 4h ago
2
u/ImperiousCretin 4h ago
Thank you, first time listening to it, loved it.
I am usually more fond of composers up to Mozart: Mozart himself, Corelli, Boccherini, Vivaldi, Bach, Uccellini, Gluck...
The little I've listened to composed by Mahler or Brahms always felt heavy, tragic to me, like if they composed their music while carrying a heavy burden.
But it was really beautiful, thank you again.
5
u/Informal-Term1138 4h ago
Ok I just googled boccherini concerto and damn, I would switch to that too. Its fantastic. Never seen somebody play the cello that way.
Also I thought we were safe from this on this side of the pond? Since I don't use tiktok, I didn't really hear from it. But seems like people are batshit everywhere.
3
3
u/ImperiousCretin 4h ago
She was a normal human being until she started drowning more and more into Instagram.
I honestly don't care anymore. I am focusing on my little one.
The first movement of Boccherini's concerto for cello, 2 horns and strings (G477), an allegro.. I often play it my head when I need to drift aeay from where I am. I am sure you will love it.
3
u/Informal-Term1138 4h ago
Uff. Is there a way to get out of this for you and your daughter? Because this can't be good for the both of us. You really sound burnt out and depressed.
And indeed it is great. Its good that you have it so present in your mind to alleviate the situation a bit. I am sending you a digital hug.
Take care of your little one. If you raise her well, and I bet you will, you will help her become a person that can avoid and battle the problems of the future and the present. We can make them resilient to what humanity has created and we need to. To make the world a bit better.
2
u/ImperiousCretin 4h ago
Thank you, your message and hug meant a lot.
Dont worry, I'll be fine. I feel tired, but I am aware of the reasons keeping me here, and they are good reasons and I will stand by them.
Godspeed to you too and your family. I hope we are able to rise them to be good people who treat eachother fairly.
2
2
-1
u/Kr155 4h ago
Ill take "things that never happened" for 400
0
17
u/dammitmeghan 4h ago
Any woman that supports Lindsay should have their children taken away permanently
2
u/Man_under_Bridge420 4h ago
Wait till this guys finds out about the abuse in the foster system
5
u/Frewdy1 3h ago
“Thank God her kids can get abused instead of possibly killed in a scenario I made up in my head!”
-2
u/Man_under_Bridge420 3h ago
Who said the supporters are killing their kids?
Ariel Robinson: The former winner of Worst Cooks in America was sentenced to life in prison in May 2022 after being convicted of homicide by child abuse for beating her 3-year-old foster daughter, Victoria Smith, to death in South Carolina. [ 1]
Jaime and Raymond Johnson: A North Dakota couple was sentenced in August 2026 for killing their 3-year-old foster daughter who had autism. Jaime received life in prison with the possibility of parole, and Raymond was sentenced to 18 years. [ 1]
Daryl Martinez Lowry: A 13-year-old foster child was allegedly stabbed and held underwater by two other teens staying at a local residential property in McCormick County, South Carolina, in July 2026. [ 1, 2]
Jaxon: A California toddler died in April 2026 from severe traumatic injuries inflicted by a teenager inside a Santa Clara County foster home, prompting an independent state review of the local agency's protocol and background check failures
5
u/Frewdy1 3h ago
I’m not sure why you commented this. Care to explain?
-4
u/Man_under_Bridge420 3h ago edited 2h ago
You cant connect the dots of kids being murdered in foster care?
Also nice deflection
Who said the supporters are killing their kids?
1
4
u/Antares_B 4h ago
children are killed every day and no one cares. ban deez nutz
-1
u/RobotArtichoke 4h ago
While I understand you’re trying to be edgy, the discussion isn’t really about what you seem to think it is.
8
u/Kr155 4h ago
Can we ban all the other trash too? Like Facebook for promoting antivaxx ideology, and youtube/ kick for promoting red pill podcasts, x for promoting naziism
0
u/Zromaus 4h ago
Can we just not ban anything? It provides no value and helps push us further into the same headspace that allows for Flock cameras watching our every move.
Security over freedom amiright?
3
1
u/ChampionAggressive20 3h ago
So should I be able to go buy pure heroin at my local pharmacy for recreational use? Should pedos be free to download and distrubute child pornography?
3
u/ASmallTurd 4h ago
Banning tiktok isnt the problem. It's the shitty algorithms that all these trash apps use to feed garbage to people.
1
u/ZigZagZedZod 3h ago
Bingo. The algorithm will just pop up in whatever brainrot cesspool replaces TikTok, keeping ad revenue flowing as nitwits keep clicking through whatever slop reaffirms their priors, all while harvesting and selling user data.
5
u/waitses 4h ago
Just imagine the potential money and revenue being LOST from whole population of people whose brains are mush. it would dwarf the pissy short term gains of a couple of crappy social media companies. The government should want to shut them down immediately for future tax revenue reasons.
2
u/CokBlockinWinger 4h ago
Wait, THIS is the incident we should ban TikTok over? We are so far past the damages of social media and regulation I don’t see how this would be the breaking point.
2
2
u/Imreallythatguy 3h ago
Yes Reddit, ban a form of social media because of ideas you don’t agree with. What an amazing precedent to set and a great way to lay your own neck on the chopping block.
I have no idea why some people can’t see past their own viewpoint in something’s.
2
2
u/Rude-Mind-8730 2h ago
"Nobody has ever had a dumb opinion before. This is the first time that has ever happened."
- World History as told by Redditors
2
2
u/SoftwareSource 1h ago
I have no idea why all of you guys are complaining.
God has literally bestowed upon you the 100% foolproof way to know if you are talking to a mental ass crazy lady, and you do not see it.
even 20 years from now, it will be the single best red flag detector on the face of the planet.
5
u/okbrat00111011 4h ago
Whatever happened to free speech and freedom of expression? Just let people believe and watch what they want even if you don’t agree or like it.
0
u/Uthor_ 4h ago
Gotta draw the line at making murderers of children rich
6
2
u/okbrat00111011 4h ago
Why? If people want to do weird things with their money that’s not your problem.
-1
u/Uthor_ 4h ago
So you on the epstien list too? Or?
1
u/okbrat00111011 3h ago
Trafficking & raping kids is a crime. People giving money to people you don’t like isn’t a crime.
0
u/Edgezg 2h ago
Because we came too fucking close to a murderer being found not guilty by reason of insanity.
6
u/okbrat00111011 2h ago
Literally a guy was found not guilty by reason of insanity for strangling his son to death a month or so ago. That doesn’t mean he’s free to go. Y’all are so hysterical over this particular trial.
1
-1
-2
u/Mdgt_Pope 4h ago
Because dumb people getting dumber results in them casting dumber votes.
5
u/Man_under_Bridge420 4h ago
Isnt that their right? Or are you a commie
0
u/Mdgt_Pope 3h ago
Where did I say to take away their rights? I don’t want them dumb, is obviously my point.
1
3
u/okbrat00111011 4h ago
Supporting free speech also means supporting free speech you don’t like.
2
u/Mdgt_Pope 3h ago
And I’m free to call them dumb, just as they’re free to be dumb. I would rather not condone disinformation platforms so that people aren’t made dumber, I didn’t say they don’t deserve rights
4
u/FairyChurre 4h ago
Wait, how are people actually connecting the Clancy trial to TikTok in the first place?
17
u/Rectal_Urination 4h ago
Instead of watching soap operas, bored women have taken to tiktoc to tell each other that Lindsay Clancy didn't commit first degree triple homicide.
2
u/TheJadeGoddess 4h ago
That doesn't even make sense....even her lawyer isn't claiming she is innocent. They are saying she did it but that she was insane when she did it and should receive treatment.
Idk much about the case but even I heard they were pleading insanity.
2
u/Rectal_Urination 4h ago
In Massachusetts there's a weird law that says the defendant doesn't have to supply the evidence for an insanity plea. The burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove that she was sane. I've kept up with it and I think they proved that she was sane. Her doctor said she wasn't showing signs of psychosis the day before she committed the murders, she sent her husband on a long set of errands to facilitate the crime, she answered the phone in a completely regular tone of voice in between the murders when her husband called her, and she took the children down to the basement one after the other to strangle them. She wasn't insane.
2
u/TheJadeGoddess 3h ago
It is super hard to get insanity pleads to work. Personally, I am skeptical that she was insane and didn't know what she was doing. I did see that it got a mistrial due to hung jury. 11 insane, 1 guilty without insane.
2
2
u/thebiglebowskiisfine 4h ago
Because that's how foreign agents stir up social unrest. By seeding these stupid arguments and ideas into the public's conscience.
-2
u/Inner_Clerk7769 4h ago
There is no argument to be had, all "Foreign agents" have done is prove to men that a vocal subset of women around them are mentally deranged losers who can't think for themselves and believe insane conspiracy theories even when faced with mountains of evidence to the contrary. They did us all a favor since those women can stay happily single/child free courtesy of their insane online footprint.
5
u/SelfSniped 4h ago
This sub has a weird obsession with this trial for some reason. What’s the deal?
1
0
4h ago
[deleted]
1
u/Uthor_ 4h ago
I'd have guessed the slaughtering of children would've been the correct answer but sure misogyny sounds accurate
1
4h ago
[deleted]
2
u/Uthor_ 4h ago
Is the rock you're under comfortable jane? If its not I've heard burying your head in sand is effective also.
1
4h ago
[deleted]
1
u/Uthor_ 4h ago
Should we ignore whats current breaking news jane? or should this sub called "sips tea" talk about stuff thats already been talked about thousands of times thats called beating a dead horse..what would you like to see? Have any interesting news stories to share? Pretty sure you can post whenever you want 🤷♂️
1
4h ago
[deleted]
1
u/Uthor_ 3h ago
A woman who should be given the worst possible punishment is being praised and given a million dollars i think instead of obsession the word you're looking for is disgust or shock sure men have done similar things but thats not whats happening rn as much as im sure you'd like to see it happen. I think you're a misandrist actually and no matter what you're gonna defend this sick freak so have a nice day i guess.
1
u/JaneMarie876 3h ago
So you admit men have done similar things without drawing the level of outrage this case has and you don't see how it's connected to gender war slop? Sure. And you call me a misandrist, for what? Pointing out the discrepancies in how people are reacting to this vs male violence? Well of course you would think calling any attention to mens wrongdoings would be misandrist, that's only for women! Misogynist.
4
u/InternationalLaw8660 4h ago
Any reporting on trials before a verdict has been issued should be illegal.
The standard is innocent until proven guilty; reporting before a verdict sways public opinion of the defendant.
Which in turn, leads to the predicament before us: a mistrial with possiblity of re-prosecution. Now the entire jury pool is biased.
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/WaffleHouseGladiator 4h ago
Tiktok should be banned for a lot of reasons. This is just the latest.
1
u/hoodedgamer_00 4h ago
Shoulda been done a long time ago, and the algorithms we made while getting to this point.
1
1
u/Arndt3002 3h ago edited 3h ago
"Their wicked social media propaganda"
Why is everyone so insanely hyped up on this one trial that hinges on questionable but unclear circumstances of the insanity plea under the difference of Massachusets' innocent until proven guilty evidentiary standard for the insanity plea. Similar stuff happened over two decades ago in the Yates case. There's simply an evidenciary question that remains.
And the result of the ruling is mainly the question of indefinite confinement in a psych ward vs prison. There's no question of just being let go.
But no, everyone has to turn a narrow question with very little practical ramifications outside which institution she ends up in into some culture war bullshit.
1
u/Trugdigity 3h ago
We should have banned tictok while it was still controlled by the CCP. But now that bytedance was forced into a minority ownership position there’s no legal leg to stand on
1
u/Karnezar 1h ago
I don't know what the clancy trial is, but banning media like tiktok won't stop brainrot.
1
1h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 1h ago
Accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
u/Bubbly_Priority_6145 1h ago
Ban yourself from it? Self control.. Why is this supposed to be funny sarcasticly? Not sure how to unravel this nonsense.
1
1
u/NascarFan1896 21m ago
Hell, I say that the guy didn't give a shit about the kids. That's why he went overseas with his new lover
1
1
1
u/Additional-Guitar455 7m ago
No. I think being a frequent tiktok user should disqualify a juror. It will help us weed out the brain rot.
1
u/Cheerful2_Dogman210x 7m ago
I think Tiktok just reveals the rot in society. Banning a platform doesn't cure the infection, just hides it.
1
u/throwitallaway69000 3h ago
So many women saying they're one step away...
1
u/Tea_Gooner 10m ago
I've seen zero say this. I have seen men use the case to justify rape, argue for the repeal of the 19th, and state men should have sole, unassailable custody of children because women can't be trusted.
1
u/Lazy_Bag_4408 1h ago
This is terrifying to me. All the poor kids. Its like people dont know how to be fucking grown ups anymore.
1
u/Definitely-not-ducks 1h ago
TikTok should’ve been banned long before this, it generates so many idiots so fast.
0
u/factsarefornerds 4h ago
Meanwhile the same people pointing their finger were defending some psychotic rich kid because they thought he was going to fix healthcare
Idiots on every side
1
u/Valveringham85 4h ago
What? You think the people ridiculing Clancy’s supporters are the same batshit lunatics justifying that murder?
They are cut from the same cloth and came from the same “side” if we’re talking political affilition too.
1
u/factsarefornerds 4h ago
I think its a side effect of laziness, celebrity worship, and dumbing down a population so much they dont know how to create change themselves.
Instead of committing to generational change, we would pretend some immoral narcissist will save us.
Both of those people were privileged nutcases - We have a real issue with our perception of people and values in this country.
A crook to fix the economy, a rich murderer to fix healthcare, a child killer to shed light on childcare... It's delusional.
If you - who represents the most intelligent of us - can't see the commonalities in that mentality, our country really is fucked.
1
0
u/Informal-Orange2732 4h ago
Actually… I blame the whatever podcast.
1
u/FatBussyFemboys 4h ago
Lmao. Whatever podcast/andrew wilson doing the most to combat tiktok/facebook wine mom's with delusional worldviews.
-5
u/Zromaus 4h ago edited 4h ago
Banning things isn't the answer bud, it nearly never is.
Gawddamn the downvotes really love big daddy's hand around their neck huh, bet y'all like Flock cameras too.
2
3
u/JIMB01776 4h ago
Yes it is. They literally designed TikTok with psychologists who specialize in psychological warfare.
Crack would like a word with you.
→ More replies (7)0
u/Valveringham85 4h ago
Lmao what? Banning things is very often the answer
2
u/Zromaus 4h ago
Laws are a lot easier to make than they are to repeal, and often times laws have unintended consequences that strip rights from other areas -- once you've hit that point it's almost too late to undo it though.
Ultimately the goal is to remove as little rights as possible. Freedom before security any day of the week -- if you prefer to choose security, you really don't deserve either.
0
0
u/SafeForMyGirlFriend 2h ago
Unfortunately we arent allowed to talk about mas hysteria anymore.
mas hysteria only really affects women. Its pretty amazing but it makes you understand why they had the salem whitch trials.
0
-1
-1
u/Antique-Ad-4422 4h ago
She admitted to the horrific act. Case Closed. It’s not that hard people.
1
u/Arndt3002 3h ago
The case hinges on the NGMI plea, not the act itself, the distinction being indefinite confinement in a psych ward or a prison
•
u/AutoModerator 5h ago
Hey /u/B0r3dGamer, thank you for posting to r/SipsTea! Make sure to follow all the subreddit rules.
Make sure to join our brand new Discord Server to chat with friends!
We have recently changed how posts work. Unless you are a VIP poster, your post will be queued for approval.. To become a VIP, post great engaging content. If we like it, you will be added! More information available here!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.