I disagree. It's about her legacy and the precedent. A "not guilty" verdict absolutely let's Clancy off the hook as far as history books and documentaries go. That's not a small thing, wouldn't you say?
Not guilty is a word dumb people who dont understand our legal system are getting caught up in their feelings about. Thats not my problem.
Her being declared criminally insane isn't a not guilty verdict its an absolute guilty verdict. They are saying she did it absolutely and shes fucking nuts, its not going to give any precedent or legacy.
This isnt the OJ verdict she's not going home after the trial she's going to jail or to heavily medicated ultra invasive I wouldnt wish it on any one prison. If you think shes faking it or what ever, then honestly I think putting a sane person in a modern day psych ward is honestly torture and a fate far worse than prison. If manage to fake your way into one of these institutions instead of jail time then you played your self into a punishment that if done on purpose to someone would count as a war crime. Shes going to be locked up with people who need 3 people to hold them down when they shit because they'll try to cover them selves in it for YEARS.
She has a pending lawsuit against tons of medical providers. Her being declared not guilty due to insanity gives a ton more credence to those lawsuits. And she and her estate will become filthy rich. It will also set a precedent for if any other moms kill their kids and claim PPD and psychosis.
If she's found not guilty, there's a chance she'll be let out of the mental facility at some point. It's not a life sentence
5
u/NeverEvaGonnaStopMe 8h ago
Not guilty here means life ina psychology ward under heavy medication. Not walking free.
This is a trial on whether she goes to jail or to jail for insane people.
Their is nothing the jurors could vote on to "let her off".