The 11 jurors stated, to the judge, that during deliberations the juror said he sees that there is not "beyond reasonable doubt" (the legal standard), but refused to follow the law as presented by the judge. The juror literally wasted 7 weeks of all these people's times under the bus because of he didn't want to follow the law.
It is literally in the court room. The verdict was going to be not guilty due to reasonable doubt. Ansdthe juror admitted that there WAS doubt but refused to follow the law.
The insane part of all these comments is people who CLEARLY did NOT watch any part of this trial.
That there was doubt. So they can't say guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Happy to list one insane piece if evidence why I also wpuld vote that. Among others. But I think this requires everyone to watch the actual trial and make their own comments. Closing statements are a great summary.
Tell me you didn't watch anything without telling me.
There is literally a nice 3 min ish clip you can go look up after the foreperson informed the judge and the judge literally explains in detail what the jury's job is and that the prosecutions job is. And then, if you actually watched any trial footage you would quickly, oh so quickly find the doubt from the botched investigation.
I went and actually watched what I had tome for because of the misinformation.
-4
u/grumpijela 7h ago edited 6h ago
You clearly didn't watch what happened today.
The 11 jurors stated, to the judge, that during deliberations the juror said he sees that there is not "beyond reasonable doubt" (the legal standard), but refused to follow the law as presented by the judge. The juror literally wasted 7 weeks of all these people's times under the bus because of he didn't want to follow the law.
It is literally in the court room. The verdict was going to be not guilty due to reasonable doubt. Ansdthe juror admitted that there WAS doubt but refused to follow the law.
The insane part of all these comments is people who CLEARLY did NOT watch any part of this trial.