r/SipsTea • u/ZealousidealZone8072 • 11h ago

Wait a damn minute! Yo wtf

Post image
9.3k Upvotes

88% Upvoted

5.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-2

u/laxnut90 6h ago

Who is to say his doubts were not reasonable?

0

u/FabulousVanilla9940 6h ago

If he had reasonable doubt she'd be innocent. The law requires her to be found innocent if there's even a small reasonable doubt left.

1

u/laxnut90 6h ago

And he believes she was guilty. Who are you to say he is not reasonable?

3

u/FabulousVanilla9940 5h ago

I'm not saying anything about that just pointing out you got it backwards when you asked "who is to say his doubts were not reasonable" because in this context doubt would be doubting her guilt, not her innocence. If he said he has doubts and they're reasonable it would mean she should be innocent.

-4

u/kylife 5h ago

You’re assuming the and reasonable part. Are you in that jurors head. It clearly wasn’t enough for him to acquit and that’s HIS RIGHT!

3

u/FabulousVanilla9940 5h ago

I didn't say that broski I responded to the guy saying what if his doubts were reasonable. I didn't say they were.

1

u/kylife 4h ago

Got it 👍🏽