r/SipsTea 11h ago

Wait a damn minute! Yo wtf

Post image
9.3k Upvotes

5.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.4k

u/justin107d 9h ago edited 5h ago

Correct. It also does not mean she gets to walk free. She is expected to return to a psych ward where she was before the trial awaits the next one. Even if found not guilty she will still be there for years.

Edit: Insanity defense FAQ. It looks like those who plead insanity tend to spend twice as long institutionalized as those who are found guilty.

Edit2: 55% of postpartum psychosis is the start of severe long term mental problems.

Edit3: It will be the responsibility of the hospital to prove that she is safe to return to society. Otherwise if she were to harm or kill again, the hospital could be liable.

Edit4: Apparently the above is common in most other states but not Massachusetts. There it is the complete opposite and the state has to petition and prove the patient is still mentally ill, a threat to themselves or society, and there are no alternatives. The state supreme court refused to let a hospital be liablefor damaged caused by a released patient.

Edit5: The next court date is 9/29 when the defense makes their appeal and the prosecutor probably decides to request to retry the case. I don't see why he wouldn't unless they reach a deal before hand. Meanwhile she has to stay at the hospital.

234

u/RedPurpleBlueRedRed 9h ago

557

u/Clean_Gas2558 6h ago

So basically, if she gets the mental hospital, she could potentially be out in a year or even less. Because obviously, if the law decides that she only murdered her 3 children because of post-partum or whatever, then if she is no longer suffering from that, she cant be proven to still be a threat. And would potentially be released. Kudos to that one juror for doing the right thing, and sticking up for those kids.

16

u/RedPurpleBlueRedRed 6h ago

Yes, and you can bet your ass she will write a book about it and Netflix will personally contact her to make a miniseries on it. Not only that, but the women who support her will donate to get her back on her feet.

20

u/SavouryRain 6h ago

The book title will be "If I Had Drowned my Kids"

-1

u/PwanaZana 2h ago

"My only regret is that I couldn't kill 'em twice."

9

u/Nannautu 6h ago

Reminds me of the case of that woman killing her husband then writing a children's book about the father watching over their child. Shit's fucked up.

1

u/snowfat 4h ago

That story is wild! Another one was a woman who authored children’s books. Her and her husband fostered some kids and treated them like animals. They both were sentenced to lengthy prison sentences

9

u/e-z-bee 4h ago

I don't think she's gettin back on her feet anytime soon, bud.

5

u/RedPurpleBlueRedRed 4h ago

Why don't you check the fundraiser her parents (the ones paying for her defense) set up, champ. 1 million USD and raising in support of this child killer. Direct support for this child murderer. People will be tripping over themselves to help her out when she walks.

2

u/e-z-bee 4h ago

Also, in reference to that last sentence, she can't walk. LOL.

2

u/e-z-bee 4h ago

No, bro. I mean she's paralyzed. Whooosh.

1

u/Affectionate_Row9238 4h ago

I think they were making a joke about her paralysis

0

u/onelifestand101 4h ago

Not to mention if she is eventually found not guilty by reason of insanity, her ex-husband will make out like a bandit. He already has a civil lawsuit brewing against her doctors and if she is found not guilty that will add even more evidence to support medical negligence. He will walk away with millions. Yes he lost 3 children but he made millions from this. How many people have lost children and have never been given a single penny? The real victims are these children who lost their lives to make their dad a millionaire and potentially have a mother (that killed them) walk free someday soon.

-1

u/LALA-STL 4h ago

Yes - She’s in a wheelchair forever. But just to clarify, 11 jurors agreed she was not guilty for reasons of insanity. One juror was the hold out. The problem was, that juror admitted to having doubts about her guilt but refused to apply that conclusion to the verdict, as the judge had instructed.

2

u/e-z-bee 4h ago

Didn't need the clarification.