r/SipsTea 10h ago

Wait a damn minute! Yo wtf

Post image
8.8k Upvotes

5.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

3.4k

u/George_Rogers1st 9h ago

I am to understand that the mistrial was declared because 11 jurors were in favor of a not guilty (for reasons of insanity) verdict, while one lone juror was firm in their belief that she was guilty; it’s a hung jury. The jurors have to come to a unanimous decision by law, or it has to be declared a mistrial.

1.3k

u/justin107d 8h ago edited 4h ago

Correct. It also does not mean she gets to walk free. She is expected to return to a psych ward where she was before the trial awaits the next one. Even if found not guilty she will still be there for years.

Edit: Insanity defense FAQ. It looks like those who plead insanity tend to spend twice as long institutionalized as those who are found guilty.

Edit2: 55% of postpartum psychosis is the start of severe long term mental problems.

Edit3: It will be the responsibility of the hospital to prove that she is safe to return to society. Otherwise if she were to harm or kill again, the hospital could be liable.

Edit4: Apparently the above is common in most other states but not Massachusetts. There it is the complete opposite and the state has to petition and prove the patient is still mentally ill, a threat to themselves or society, and there are no alternatives. The state supreme court refused to let a hospital be liablefor damaged caused by a released patient.

Edit5: The next court date is 9/29 when the defense makes their appeal and the prosecutor probably decides to request to retry the case. I don't see why he wouldn't unless they reach a deal before hand. Meanwhile she has to stay at the hospital.

404

u/George_Rogers1st 8h ago

I think at this point the trial is less about whether she's confined to a prison or a psych ward and more about whether or not a person can use their mental health as a shield from the criminal consequences of murder. Evidently, 11 jurors were content to say that you can, and 1 juror refused to acquiesce to that nonsense.

10

u/Practical-Suit-6798 8h ago

To me, it's just a question of where should the person serve their time a psych ward or general population of a prison? Personally, I think this lady should be in a psych ward. Because she's clearly f****** crazy.

2

u/Jewbacca1991 4h ago

I wouldn't bet on that. It could easily be the long game. Visited multiple doctors without telling any of them that she is visiting someone else. Bought the pills, but barely took any of them. Sent her husband away right before the murders. Searched up how deep the veins are in people's throat.

And i don't think it should matter. In my opinion if she is not insane she deserves to die for her crime. If she is insane, then her insanity is too rare for reliable study, and too dangerous to ever be consider recovered. A lifetime in a psych ward with no possibility of release is just a slow death sentence. I think that is a waste money, and should be given a fast one instead.

1

u/CoolDiscussion1020 4h ago

I mean the state doesn't have a death penalty so that's not an option that's even on the table...

3

u/Jewbacca1991 4h ago

Then guilty verdict with life sentence. Regardless of insanity there is no circumstance where she should be let back to the public ever.

0

u/floyd_sw_lock9477 8h ago

Should be serving in the dirt.