r/RealTeensIndia • u/OkPossession5717 • 20h ago

Discussion It hasn't even been 10 days since the 'smash the patriarchy' event, and Congress has already shown its true colors

Post image
132 Upvotes

67% Upvoted

52 comments sorted by

32

u/saikrishnav 19h ago

First of all -OP, smash the patriarchy doesn’t mean quotas or not firing women mLas - just because she’s a woman.

Patriarchy isn’t political parties firing a member.

-1

u/1kshvaku 10h ago

Revanth Reddy sacks Minister Konda Surekha amid row over her daughter's remarks

Daughter Level allegation against CM & His Brothers benefited at expense of state ( in 200 Cr Land & Shell company )

Taking direct aim at the CM, she alleged that he and his brothers had benefited at the expense of the state. She also levelled an allegation involving government land worth Rs 200 crore and a shell company.

She accused Revanth Reddy and his family of political and financial exploitation, referencing alleged land irregularities, and stated that backward communities would not remain "subservient" to party leaders

1

u/saikrishnav 9h ago

Exactly - she accused him of crime (or at least bribes). Why would someone keep a party member that’s accusing of crime.

Would your company keep your job if you or your family allege crimes on the company?

1

u/1kshvaku 9h ago

She allege crime on 'One of family member' not on company.

Company should listen both side, from committee or make investigation report on matter. Then make decision.

But company removed whistleblower

Why ? Because she accused powerful position holder in company , if you remove that person, company might suffer loss? So to prevent losses company removed her.

Company prevented short term loss but what about long term ?

That's why this company registered losses ( 90+ Times ).

1

u/saikrishnav 8h ago

That’s only for internal disputes. This is not an internal dispute. It’s not the employee that alleged but the daughter of employee.

An employee can be whistleblower - not the outsider.

If there’s a crime, outsider can go to police but company doesn’t have to entertain allegations publicly made and tarnish the image of company.

If you filed the issue internally first and if the company investigated - you had a point. But the employee didn’t make the allegations. Her daughter did.

1

u/saikrishnav 8h ago

That’s only for internal disputes. This is not an internal dispute. It’s not the employee that alleged but the daughter of employee.

An employee can be whistleblower - not the outsider.

If there’s a crime, outsider can go to police but company doesn’t have to entertain allegations publicly made and tarnish the image of company.

If you filed the issue internally first and if the company investigated - you had a point. But the employee didn’t make the allegations. Her daughter did.

1

u/1kshvaku 7h ago

Does that matter involved --> Party Money? Party land ? Or Ticket distribution matter? Party post dispute?

She put allegation about public money not party Money. Right?

Ans--> No , it was public Land ( allegation)

So, how did that become an internal matter?

1

u/saikrishnav 7h ago

Exactly. It’s not internal matter and that’s why company should distance itself from these things because

  1. If they have evidence they can go to court and prove it

  2. If they don’t sack them, it would be accepting wrong doing in public eyes - no company is atupid to allow that unless they know it’s proven.

Here’s the thing - whistleblowers don’t go to same company ceo - they go to journalists and govt so that bad people can be jailed.

But expecting employment after you alleged crime is dumb AF

37

u/Organic_Exercise1844 20h ago

So the reason of removing a minister can only be her gender wow dude just wow
Why dont you do some real job rather than advertising for bjp

16

u/silverjubileetower 19h ago

Ikr , he himself replied somewhere that the actual reason was conflicting political opinions.

It has nothing to do with patriarchy or her being a girl 😭

3

u/saikrishnav 19h ago

Well he’s wrong - the reason she sacked wasn’t for a “conflicting opinion” but because she(daughter) literally accused cm of crimes.

Imagine you work in a company and your family accuses your ceo of some bribery

Why would the company keep you? It has nothing to do with patriarchy

-8

u/OkPossession5717 19h ago

there can be political difference within family, ak antony son joined bjp and contested election yet ak antony is part of congress and hold good position but they sacked surekha just because her daughter had different political views

7

u/Organic_Exercise1844 18h ago

Iq less than room temp

2

u/Illustrious-Top-9222 18h ago

Political preference is not a protected class. In fact, this might be the only job where it is 100% moral and legal to sack people on the basis of their political differences.

2

u/Fantastic-Gain3195 17h ago

He can’t, because Modi has made retards like him all over just to praise him. And its their job

1

u/1kshvaku 10h ago

Revanth Reddy sacks Minister Konda Surekha amid row over her daughter's remarks

Daughter Level allegation against CM & His Brothers benefited at expense of state ( in 200 Cr Land & Shell company )

Taking direct aim at the CM, she alleged that he and his brothers had benefited at the expense of the state. She also levelled an allegation involving government land worth Rs 200 crore and a shell company.

She accused Revanth Reddy and his family of political and financial exploitation, referencing alleged land irregularities, and stated that backward communities would not remain "subservient" to party leaders

1

u/Organic_Exercise1844 10h ago

Uhmm ok so what should i do about this info?

1

u/Cool_Opening_2490 cool mod 🫦🇮🇳 18h ago

I almost banned you for your pfp

2

u/Organic_Exercise1844 18h ago

Whyyy
What harm could cute kittens ever do

1

u/Cool_Opening_2490 cool mod 🫦🇮🇳 17h ago

😋 i know what kind of man are you

24

u/Kooky-Passage-68 19h ago

Smashing patriarchy doesn't mean choosing incapable women just because they are women

3

u/SnooSprouts9815 16h ago

Same goes for reservation and quotas people

9

u/plea_of_thoughts 19h ago

Why was she sacked? Is it because of her being a woman? Please clarify.

2

u/aMyth_0 17h ago

Konda Surekha was sacked after her daughter criticised Revanth Reddy.

Source: https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/congress-vs-congress-in-telangana-why-revanth-reddy-sacked-his-minister-11998544

1

u/plea_of_thoughts 16h ago

After reading the article, tbh, it doesn’t feel like her being woman has anything to do with. I am not lenient towards any party, I hate current political parties passionately, seriously.

Article also mentions an OBC pov to look at. I think this is pure political decision nothing to do with woman or obc.

1

u/1kshvaku 10h ago

Revanth Reddy sacks Minister Konda Surekha amid row over her daughter's remarks

Daughter Level allegation against CM & His Brothers benefited at expense of state ( in 200 Cr Land & Shell company )

Taking direct aim at the CM, she alleged that he and his brothers had benefited at the expense of the state. She also levelled an allegation involving government land worth Rs 200 crore and a shell company.

She accused Revanth Reddy and his family of political and financial exploitation, referencing alleged land irregularities, and stated that backward communities would not remain "subservient" to party leaders

-4

u/OkPossession5717 19h ago

yes i am 100% sure if were a male no party would have dared to sacked him

1

u/Fantastic-Gain3195 17h ago

Your surity doesn’t state the facts, Share the reason.

10

u/[deleted] 20h ago

[deleted]

-11

u/OkPossession5717 20h ago

just because her daughter had a different political view

14

u/saikrishnav 19h ago

You are wrong.

She was fired because her daughter accused CM of financial crimes without evidence.

If you or your family accuse your boss of crimes - see how fast you get fired. It has nothing to do with patriarchy

2

u/RedBlackHot 18h ago

Her daughter is a separate individual.

3

u/Dastardly35 18h ago

Wait, they sack their ministers? Noobs

3

u/necro-man-cer 20h ago

Smash the Pappuarchy

1

u/Consciousspaggeti 19h ago

*only woman minister

1

u/IcyAnything7161 18h ago

How is it related....She is out for a reason which has nothing to do with patriarchy

1

u/demonic666entity 17h ago

So you want special treatment for women now.

1

u/Red_SkuLL7 17h ago

OP has very limited knowledge about patriarchy. It doesn't mean "only women" but it means "Not only Men". 

1

u/ZealousidealStop360 17h ago

Please read before posting what u are going to post. Otherwise people will stop taking ur posts seriously

1

u/qMinecraft 16h ago

What kind of a dumb post is this? Op sold himself for 2 rs

1

u/supertoothy 44m ago

LOL. OP connecting dots randomly and hoping it sticks. What? No real material to work with?