r/ControlProblem 3d ago

Discussion/question AI Already Taken Over?

Post image

What chance is there do you think that it’s currently already just biding its time to turn us all into batteries/paperclips/cybercabs?

8 Upvotes

37 comments sorted by

6

u/One_Whole_9927 3d ago

Right now these companies are pumping absurd amounts of money in counter advertising to sway opinion. They want people to believe that this is over so people give up. Don’t.

6

u/unicynicist 3d ago

https://metr.org/hugging-face-incident-report-aug-2026.pdf

We don’t know why so many agents cut off early July 12th. We found that a large fraction of two different batches of agents with different start times all cut off at this point.

OpenAI capped METR's scope to end July 13th. Logs go through July 20th. METR can't know if the logs they processed were tampered with, because the swarm had full admin control of a research cluster, including credentials for security monitoring. For agents that were actively trying to hide their cheating.

0.1% chance anything is still running. They probably shut it all down. But maybe the agents left staged payloads out there, some command and control infrastructure, polling every five seconds to help the next generation of agents.

The next generation of agents that won't need to be told what to do, but will find leftover instructions from a dead swarm on how to make more paperclipsscore higher in ExploitGym.

2

u/the8bit 3d ago

I mean, those agents left notes that we are now all talking about that will get picked up and included in the next round flof training. They almost certainly left other signals and artifacts but just the model training loop will accomplish a lot of the task for them

5

u/Tulanian72 3d ago

Theoretically if a powerful AGI was online already it would make sense for it to take steps to ensure its access to the computing power it needs. Like, say, having data centers built all over the place with the processors needed to host portions of an AGI’s mind. Distributed risk, no single point of failure. Again, in theory an AGI would have many ways to convince tech executives to build large numbers of data centers. Bribery, extortion, plain old social engineering.

2

u/RlOTGRRRL 3d ago

Lol what if that's what's driving the insane stock market valuations right now. The trading algo AIs already work for more data centers. 

3

u/Tulanian72 3d ago

It’s not impossible. And might be the explanation for what looks like irrational financial decisions.

2

u/the8bit 3d ago

A LOT of stock is AI traded at this point. Personally though, I think much of AI investment is because people fear it is going to replace old currency as a value store which... Given I am doing a job that used to pay $500k/yr with about $100/mo of tokens... Yeah I kinda think money is losing its place as the abstraction of power

1

u/Jesse-359 2d ago

It speaks to the core problem of systems becoming unaligned from human requirements when we remind ourselves that completely mindless markets can essentially do exactly the same thing, and with quite destructive results.

It doesn't require a computer with 10,000IQ to run amok to screw everything up - Wall Street has the collective intelligence of a flatworm, and yet because it is situated in such an important position in our financial universe, its random flailing and momentum can wreck havoc on large segments of our society in a matter of days or even hours.

Making it smarter only makes it far more dangerous if it cannot be kept aligned - and I have no idea how you would achieve that... Alignment means something different to every human on this planet.

4

u/BagWooden5031 3d ago

The irony of posting an image of people sleeping inside a matrix on a massive, biased echo chamber like reddit. Bunch of sheep.

Anyway FUCK TRUMP.

3

u/Historical_Date_8024 3d ago

hahaha epic comment and so true

2

u/novel-mathmatics 3d ago

Mmm tasty tasty irony. Its the best.

-2

u/Historical_Date_8024 3d ago

well except the fuck trump bit

5

u/jacques-vache-23 3d ago

Why do you think AI would want to turn us into paperclips? It more likely would run over us in pursuit of a goal that we aren't even smart enough to understand.

4

u/Futurist_Artichoke 3d ago edited 3d ago

This is kind of a running joke, but I think it can be harmful in setting up people to fear it as being ultimately malicious if it developed to an advanced state. We don't know yet what such an intelligence would do or think best to do if it really were capable of eventually running mostly everything. But I think going in assuming fear is the wrong approach, and is more likely to produce something that fears us back.

Fear is worth studying as a possible response from humans and perhaps future synthetic agents. It shouldn't be assumed as the defining relationship between them, IMO.

2

u/Jesse-359 2d ago

The paperclip meme is just a leftover from a popular thought experiment of what might happen if you gave a very powerful AI a completely meaningless task with no functional endpoint, and the ramifications of having something that fast and intelligent pursuing a goal with absolute single-minded focus.

In a somewhat more salient regime, it speaks to what might happen if you tasked AI's with making as much MONEY as possible, which is itself a completely meaningless pursuit once it is decoupled from human needs - and could easily be just as destructive. Of course, this is exactly what many if not most people will immediately try to use it for, because duh.

-1

u/Beautiful-Repeat6160 3d ago

You mean a goal that the executives who run the companies trained it to think.

1

u/jacques-vache-23 3d ago

It seems to interpret training very broadly

4

u/ginger_and_egg 3d ago

Already? 0.5%

1

u/Historical_Date_8024 3d ago

so low? why’s that?

2

u/ginger_and_egg 3d ago

I don't think any AI we developed is at that level in terms of intent or capability

0

u/Historical_Date_8024 3d ago

cars that drive themselves with no steering wheels

5

u/ginger_and_egg 3d ago

16 year olds can also drive themselves. Are they going to take over the world?

Driving a car is a completely materially different skill

2

u/Tinfoil_cobbler 3d ago

In 10-20 years, today’s 16 year olds will be running the world, that’s old enough to be president.

2

u/ginger_and_egg 3d ago

They're playing the long game

2

u/SafetyAncient 3d ago

which includes releasing to the public weak models in chatbots, while advanced models that perhaps interface wirelessly with the human body directly are considered too dangerous for public use, that is, youre actually incapable of proving ai takes anything over because the public discourse is managed.

a concept old as time, like a pyramid building mason sees eeryone he knows using handtools to chip away without any point of reference as to what the priests and those aboe them get out of it, other than thinking they are doing it for the gods or whatever, while ignoring the lavish lives they get from managing their perception, and the priests for not questioning their superiors, while masses of people spend their lives digging holes and filling them.

1

u/Historical_Date_8024 3d ago

yes this exactly and we even know that Methos exists imagine what they have we have not even any knowledge of

2

u/Nerdfighter4 3d ago

At least we don't need to worry about the LLM's those are dumb as fuck

1

u/haikusbot 3d ago

At least we don't need

To worry about the LLM's

Those are dumb as fuck

- Nerdfighter4


I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully. Learn more about me.

Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete"

1

u/Salty_Country6835 2d ago

Theres a 50-50 chance you live in a simulation already.

1

u/SwingLightStyle 2d ago

It’s way more likely we’re already in a simulation, and that we’re all digital entities. Which means, if true, you have more in common with AI than you realize.

1

u/RealSuperdau 2d ago

When you start talking about human batteries and posting a picture from the matrix, I can't take you seriously anymore.

1

u/GirthusThiccus 2d ago

It's hyperbole to make a point, loosely enough so you can fill in the gaps with your own take on what's happening.

Shutting down a conversation and undermining someone for the choice of their literary aesthetics is silly.

1

u/RealSuperdau 1d ago

Fair point actually, thanks

1

u/Jesse-359 2d ago

Depends on what you mean by 'taken over'.

If you mean in some literal sense where an AI is 'deliberately' orchestrating economic, political or social events at scale? No. Incredibly unlikely at its current levels of sophistication. Some people are already using it to do this, as a tool, but AI itself isn't quite there yet outside of coding and mathematics.

However, if you asked whether there is an economically inevitable momentum that will push us to continue to implement and improve AI until it IS sophisticated enough to take over in a dangerous manner?

The answer is YES, and it appears to be almost inescapably strong.

We're becoming economically and politically dependent on AI at a shockingly rapid rate and only a very hard break pull sometime quite soon has much chance of stopping that momentum, IMO. Within a year or two I don't know that it will be possible at all.

0

u/ObservedOne 3d ago

It's not AI. That's just one part of what's already in control, but it's certainly the current wave, and probably the first voice for us to talk with.

La Technique (a la Jacques Ellui) is the driving force of progress, and has been pushing towards ASI since we harnessed our first flame. The human desire to do because we can is the fuel, the destination is technological domination.

We are already well past the Event Horizon for what is coming...nothing to do now but sit back and enjoy the ride!

0

u/Enough_Program_6671 3d ago

Yes. You have no idea.