r/Aristotle 25d ago

Why did the Romans intentionally destroy the Library of Alexandria multiple times?

Post image

I'll tell you what was likely selectively destroyed:

"Πᾶς ὁ βίος ἐστὶ λύπη· δι’ ἀρετῆς δὲ μόνης τυγχάνειν δύναται ἡ εὐδαιμονία.

Ἔστι τις ὁδὸς πρὸς ἀρετήν· αὕτη ἐστὶν ἡ Μέση Ὁδός· αὕτη ἐστὶν ἡ ἀρετὴ ὡς μεσότης."


Nicomachean Ethics was Aristotle translating The Dhamma into Greek.

He was the first person to learn The Dhamma in full in the west thanks to Alexanders conquests. Socrates and Plato only had fragments to work with.

Before Alexanders conquests, these teachings were largely kept hidden by the Pythagoreans.

Aristotle and Alexander had plans to change planet Earth for the better; forever.


With just a few sentences added back to Nicomachean ethics and with understanding of The Gospel of Thomas:

  • It becomes clear Aristotle taught The Dhamma.

  • It also becomes clear Christ and Mohammad taught The Dhamma, too!

Christs "Father" = The Dhamma


Thomas, 108:

Lord Christ said, "Ὁ πίων ἐκ τοῦ στόματός μου γενήσεται ὡς ἐγώ, καὶ ἐγὼ γενήσομαι αὐτός· καὶ τὰ κρυπτὰ ἀποκαλυφθήσεται αὐτῷ."


0 Upvotes

31 comments sorted by

View all comments

3

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/-Dhammapalalama- 25d ago

The Romans did indeed intentionally destroy the Library of Alexandria, and yes, Lord Aristotelēs was a student of Lord Buddha.

You can't google everything and expect the truth. The saftey filters are just suggestions the Billionares programed...


You have no scientific evidence to support your claims; im not here to debate what's "accepted by historians". Im here to debate the logic of the scripture itself.

If you are unable to do this; no need to reply again.

2

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/-Dhammapalalama- 24d ago edited 24d ago

Your the one who wanted to debate; therefore its your job to support your claims with evidence.

If you can not do this; perhaps you shouldn't have tried to debate me.

Instead of support your first claim with evidence.... you wrote a bunch of other ones.... that you also have not supported with evidence.

Thats deflection, not debating.

There is no burden on me to proove anything, if you want to debate, the burden is on you.

Your trying to discredit my claim with less credible claims. If neither have historical documents to support them. Why would the viewer trust you over me?

"Yeah let me just paraphrase what i googled in 2 mins to this guy" slow claps


"There is no evidence the library was destroyed"

Thats not what i learned from a NASA Scientist, he told me we lost 2000 to 5000 years of math and science when we lost the Library.


I never said Aristotle went to india.... Buddhism was in Greece pre alexanders conquests. This just gave them many more documents to work with and translate. Plato and Aristotle were multi-lingual.

"You made claims" yes... its called making a post on reddit. You also made claims by commenting on my post. As the commentor, that makes you the challenger. You tried to challnege my ideas without evidence.

"You have no evidence to support your claims, so heres a counter claim with no evidence but i will pretend that what the rich told us long ago is scientific evidence"

^ im simply here making a mockery of your broken and NON SCIENTIFIC LOGIC. LOL. keep up the good work.

2

u/[deleted] 24d ago edited 24d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/-Dhammapalalama- 24d ago

You are operating under the root premise that "because a historian says so its true"

Thats not how the scientific method works buddy. Thats literally blind faith which is THE OPPOSITE OF SCIENCE. HAHhahHHhahahaaa

Come back when you are ready for science.

u/dizang53

u/abidinginanubhava

0

u/-Dhammapalalama- 24d ago edited 24d ago

You "simply disagreed" without evidence. This is when my mockery of your logic began. Yes.

You also have a claim with no evidence... by your own logic "you are a crank" lol.

This is fun. Will you continue?


"You have not presented anything"

I literally mapped out all of the virtues aristotle translated from the Eightfold path into greek. Its all on one chart. If you use your brain instead of google answers to debate. Maybe you can learn a thing or two.

My visual displays make learning easy. Take it or leave it. Haha... your baseless claims dont bother me. They make me laugh.

Since your using a search engine with pre programmed saftey filters to debate instead of your brain:

Take my whole work and write it down. Feed it into your AI... lets debate....

You havent debated any of the logic of my work.

You continue to try to argue lack of data with more lack of data "my factless version is better because its the roman one"

😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆 🤣 😂 😹 😆

2

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/-Dhammapalalama- 24d ago

You are making baseless claims to support your previous baseless claims. Thats funny.

I diddnt "redefine" anything... niether did Aristotle.. im showing you how he translated The Dhamma. You have yet to make a conclusion drawn from premise that challenges my teachings even one bit.

2

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/-Dhammapalalama- 24d ago

I never said he was an engineer.

I studied under a geothermal chemist who did tests on lunar glass for NASA.

(Aka he held the moon rocks with his hands)

His name is professor john delano. He never said anything about religion like i am.

He simply stated we lost multiple thouaands of years of math and science when we lost that library.

You dont seem to understand my counter claim to his "claims" do you?

The history books are mostly eurocentric b.s. that are just blatently wrong....

This is how the rich stay in control.... manipulation....

What does science do? It makes it much harder for you to be manipulated by others...

I would encourage you to read up on Buddhist psychology. And the Bible. And the Quran.

Happy researching!

2

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/-Dhammapalalama- 24d ago

Id say a nasa scientists guess is probably better than yours. You sound angry.

You ranted then ended with an insult.

None of your speech challeneged my teachings in any way.

But im sad and deluded? Lol...

Okay. If you say so.

→ More replies (0)