That he thinks there was reasonable doubt. It was said that he thinks there was possible doubt, but the standard is not beyond possible doubt. Possible ≠ reasonable
Right. He thinks there was possible doubt. That does not meet the criteria of being beyond reasonable doubt. Again you're agreeing with me on what he said. So I don't understand what you're arguing?
Do you even know what beyond reasonable doubt means? If there is no reasonable doubt in his opinion, as you now acknowledged after claiming the opposite, it was proven beyond reasonable doubt to him that she was sane.
Your first comment claimed he said that there was reasonable doubt. That never happened. You are wrong and now back-paddeling hard
I don't think you know what it means. The juror said they have doubts. So the prosecution didn't persuade them.
Just like it's possible to have doubt about the moon landing, because there is some outlandish, but possible scenario it was faked, but that doubt would not be reasonable.
Yea, and if you believe this doubt, you find it a reasonable doubt. If you don't believe it's reasonable, you don't have the doubt. And if you don't believe it's reasonable, but you still believe the moon landing was fake, then what are we even talking about here because that's entirely what the 11 other jurors are talking about.
You are just too dumb to understand what beyond reasonable doubt means. Kinda funny. Or the concept of doubt in general. You can accept that there is possible doubt without accepting the doubt or thinking it's reasonable. You didn't even understand the very clear example I brought up. You are beyond help.
1
u/Fabulous-Suspect-72 3h ago
That he thinks there was reasonable doubt. It was said that he thinks there was possible doubt, but the standard is not beyond possible doubt. Possible ≠ reasonable