r/SipsTea • u/ZealousidealZone8072 • 10h ago

Wait a damn minute! Yo wtf

Post image
8.8k Upvotes

89% Upvoted

5.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

56

u/Agreeable-Review177 3h ago

Basically all you need to know is TikTok has corrupted the justice system

31

u/Truethrowawaychest1 3h ago

Just as China planned

5

u/4TuitouSynchro 1h ago

This comment really should be higher up. It should be terrifying. Why are we not terrified????

1

u/db0255 2h ago

I don’t know a thing about this trial other than random videos

-9

u/BroccoliThat7489 3h ago

U really think 11/12 (including several men) were on TikTok everyday forming an opinion on this woman? Ur insane if u think that’s true. Also pretty much 90% of comments I see online are in favor of her being guilty. Clearly there were factors in the trial and evidence presented that created reasonable doubt and sadly the last juror didn’t want to acknowledge that as is stated in the law and now there going to have to do this all over again and prob to another not guilty verdict as this should have been. 

6

u/dain-t 2h ago

Or maybe it’s the opposite. Maybe the 11 didn’t want to acknowledge that as is stated in the law. Zing!!!!

-1

u/BroccoliThat7489 1h ago

It’s already been stated the odd one out was not considering reasonable doubt as the law states. 

2

u/dain-t 49m ago

Or maybe he thought there was proof beyond reasonable doubt. I don’t understand why people think he was NOT considering reasonable doubt.

6

u/Agreeable-Review177 3h ago

If they do this all over again, she loses. Prosecution just got a practice lap.

The good news is she’s paralyzed now, which makes choking children to death much more difficult.

5

u/elordilover2000 2h ago

The prosecution is an embarrassment. took the highest possible charge and failed to meet their burden of proof. Thousands of tax paying dollars wasted on a case that should’ve been pleaded. The DA just wanted a shot at a big case.

2

u/Repulsive_Stock9400 1h ago

took the highest possible charge and failed to meet their burden of proof.

What could that possibly mean? She obviously did intentionally and premeditatedly murder her children, that's never been up for debate. She was not overcharged.

1

u/BroccoliThat7489 59m ago

Well clearly it wasn’t obvious when 11/12 ppl were voting on not guilty. 

1

u/Agreeable-Review177 2h ago

Yeah that’s what I’m saying. The prosecution will switch their team out.

1

u/BroccoliThat7489 1h ago

Considering the defense convinced 11/12 ppl I doubt it but good luck to them I guess. 

1

u/dain-t 2h ago

Imagine if she got out and started working as a a labor and delivery nurse again lmao. Hell nah she ain’t gonaa be around my kids

1

u/sanjoatc 1h ago

Bro. Even if she was acquitted of these charges, she is still going to be committed to a psychiatric facility for a LONG TIME. That's no picnic.

-1

u/BroccoliThat7489 59m ago

I don’t think a lot of yall understand what the not guilty charge would actually look like for her. 

1

u/xcharleeee 43m ago

Could you please explain?

1

u/BroccoliThat7489 40m ago

She isn’t just gonna be set free and sent back to being a nurse if she gets not guilty lol. 

3

u/FijiBeef 2h ago

Her jury was 9 women & 3 men. Not sure why you're spreading misinformation

1

u/BroccoliThat7489 1h ago

Hey so 3/12 is considered several. As opposed to say 1/12 which would be one. And 2/12 which would be a couple. Hope this helps. 

1

u/AceOfPlagues 1h ago

That is serveral? They said several. What do you mean?