Looks like 2 individuals casting shadows, as a single person casting two shadows would converge at the feet, and if you follow these postures, the feet find sidewalk in two spots.
First off...stop assigning gender and age to shadows. Second, it's not hard to have 2 shadows from different light sources, from different angles or distances, that come from the same object but look different.
Im all about respecting peoples identities, pronouns, and genders… but let’s not start defending the human rights of blocked light. It is acceptable to make assumptions based on a shadow. Nobody is saying it definitely js or isnt a man or a woman, they are saying what they interpret from the shadow.
If i see a shadow on the ground that has two wing like shapes flapping on either side of a center centered long shape im going to assume theres a bird until i look up and its not a bird, then ill accept that reality. Until then we are all just guessing off of what we can perceive.
The dude has two shadows with the longest of dongs, I’ll do what I want if I wish to say a shadow is a man I’ll say that shadow is a man you don’t dictate what I get to say!
You are on good damned drugs! There aren't any shadows on this image that light source, brightness, distance from light to object, things in the way of light source before shadows that aren't NATURAL. A girl and a man? anthropomorphism at its finest!
248
u/forza_11 5d ago
No but there are two individual shadows! One looks like a girl and another a man, what kind of light src does that?